<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic YDK x PyangBind x your own code. in Tools</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/tools/ydk-x-pyangbind-x-your-own-code/m-p/4117289#M1830</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am new to this net programmability field and YANG. So, I am looking for some advises here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I started using ncclient to interact with devices and models. But it is time consuming to decode the modul and code your filters (like &amp;lt;config&amp;gt;&amp;lt;native&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ip&amp;gt;&amp;lt;route&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/route&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ip&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/native&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/config&amp;gt;) or to parser the reply to find the value you need, especially because configuration/state &amp;nbsp;have many syntaxes variation. Consider, for example, that simple static route, besides the prefix and next hop, &lt;EM&gt;may &lt;/EM&gt;have output interface, admin distances, descriptions, track objects, etc, and all its combination, like a static route with admin distance, description and track.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have found both YDK and PyangBing can ease the way. So my questions are: what are the advantages/disadvantages of using YDK or PyangBind? Or do you prefer to code the interaction by yourself? When choose one or another?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2020 17:44:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pauloroque</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-07-12T17:44:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>YDK x PyangBind x your own code.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/tools/ydk-x-pyangbind-x-your-own-code/m-p/4117289#M1830</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am new to this net programmability field and YANG. So, I am looking for some advises here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I started using ncclient to interact with devices and models. But it is time consuming to decode the modul and code your filters (like &amp;lt;config&amp;gt;&amp;lt;native&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ip&amp;gt;&amp;lt;route&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/route&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ip&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/native&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/config&amp;gt;) or to parser the reply to find the value you need, especially because configuration/state &amp;nbsp;have many syntaxes variation. Consider, for example, that simple static route, besides the prefix and next hop, &lt;EM&gt;may &lt;/EM&gt;have output interface, admin distances, descriptions, track objects, etc, and all its combination, like a static route with admin distance, description and track.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have found both YDK and PyangBing can ease the way. So my questions are: what are the advantages/disadvantages of using YDK or PyangBind? Or do you prefer to code the interaction by yourself? When choose one or another?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2020 17:44:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/tools/ydk-x-pyangbind-x-your-own-code/m-p/4117289#M1830</guid>
      <dc:creator>pauloroque</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-12T17:44:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

