<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Paessler PRTG in Network Platform API</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449527#M7696</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.meraki.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/86735"&gt;@CoreyDavoll1&lt;/A&gt; If you want I'd happy to give you access to our service observability platform which you can integrate in with Meraki and see if it gives you similar results? Drop me a private message if this sounds interesting and we'll organise from there. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MartinSHighlight</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-11-14T14:59:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Paessler PRTG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449523#M7692</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone out there use the Paessler PRTG Meraki sensor?  I've had it setup for a while without much issues but yesterday I started getting alerts that both wan interfaces on random MX's were in a failed state.  This seems to be cycling through all our MX's 1 to 2 at a time.  I've engaged their support and am waiting to hear back but from the logs it looks like the api is returning the failed state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is a snippet from their log&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[{"networkId":"L_586030901511592891","serial":"Q2YN-GQZV-VK8K","model":"MX85","highAvailability":{"enabled":false,"role":"primary"},"lastReportedAt":"2024-11-13T17:35:25Z","uplinks":[{"interface":"wan1","status":"failed","ip":"50.220.75.194","gateway":"50.220.75.193","publicIp":"50.220.75.194","primaryDns":"208.67.222.222","secondaryDns":"208.67.220.220","ipAssignedBy":"static"},{"interface":"wan2","status":"failed","ip":"131.239.184.74","gateway":"131.239.184.73","publicIp":"131.239.184.74","primaryDns":"208.67.222.222","secondaryDns":"207.67.220.220","ipAssignedBy":"static"}]}]&lt;BR /&gt;2024-11-13 18:00:38.552508 DEBG TId 5264 Result of Sensor 20521&amp;gt; Uplink Q2YN-GQZV-VK8K&lt;BR /&gt;2024-11-13 18:00:38.552508 DEBG TId 5264 Result of Sensor 20521&amp;gt; - wan1 has status failed&lt;BR /&gt;2024-11-13 18:00:38.552508 DEBG TId 5264 Result of Sensor 20521&amp;gt; - wan2 has status failed&lt;BR /&gt;2024-11-13 18:00:38.552508 DEBG TId 5264 Result of Sensor 20521&amp;gt; Requesting device statuses&lt;BR /&gt;2024-11-13 18:00:39.169841 DEBG TId 5264 Result of Sensor 20521&amp;gt; 200 OK&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:23:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449523#M7692</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoreyDavoll1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-13T18:23:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paessler PRTG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449524#M7693</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was never able to get this working reliably myself. FYI if you aren't aware PRTG has changed from perpetual licensing to a subscription model with many customers seeing large increases. Paessler was sold to a private company hence the license changes&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 23:53:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449524#M7693</guid>
      <dc:creator>BlakeRichardson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-13T23:53:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paessler PRTG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449525#M7694</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm no expert on PRTG logs, but to me that reads like Meraki are reporting the interfaces as failed? No sign of this on the Meraki dashboard?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 09:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449525#M7694</guid>
      <dc:creator>MartinSHighlight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-14T09:07:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paessler PRTG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449526#M7695</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's how I interpreted it too.  Dashboard looks fine.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:09:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449526#M7695</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoreyDavoll1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-14T13:09:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paessler PRTG</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449527#M7696</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.meraki.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/86735"&gt;@CoreyDavoll1&lt;/A&gt; If you want I'd happy to give you access to our service observability platform which you can integrate in with Meraki and see if it gives you similar results? Drop me a private message if this sounds interesting and we'll organise from there. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-platform-api/paessler-prtg/m-p/5449527#M7696</guid>
      <dc:creator>MartinSHighlight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-14T14:59:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

