<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Secure Access vs Secure Connect in Secure Access Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/secure-access-discussions/secure-access-vs-secure-connect/m-p/5329371#M68</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Secure Connect is for Meraki customers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It integrates Meraki dashboard and Umbrella with some features back ported from Secure Access into it. It is very easy and automatic to do the Meraki integration to route traffic in/out to the sites/internet as well as add 3rd party tunnels. It replaces their 'Sigraki' integration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Secure Access is vendor agnostic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It will requires effort to connect sites at this time. I believe Cisco is working on making site integration with SDWAN and Meraki automated, maybe FTD as well.&amp;nbsp; Note SDWAN can be automated for egress only tunnel connections at this time 2025-09&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Secure Access also has additional features not included in Secure Connect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:29:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Telford</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-11T16:29:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Secure Access vs Secure Connect</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/secure-access-discussions/secure-access-vs-secure-connect/m-p/5320574#M53</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What's the difference between these two solutions? I'm very curious since they seem to serve the same purpose. When should we propose Secure Access, and when should we propose Secure Connect?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 03:37:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/secure-access-discussions/secure-access-vs-secure-connect/m-p/5320574#M53</guid>
      <dc:creator>dianawinsky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-14T03:37:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Secure Access vs Secure Connect</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/secure-access-discussions/secure-access-vs-secure-connect/m-p/5329371#M68</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Secure Connect is for Meraki customers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It integrates Meraki dashboard and Umbrella with some features back ported from Secure Access into it. It is very easy and automatic to do the Meraki integration to route traffic in/out to the sites/internet as well as add 3rd party tunnels. It replaces their 'Sigraki' integration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Secure Access is vendor agnostic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It will requires effort to connect sites at this time. I believe Cisco is working on making site integration with SDWAN and Meraki automated, maybe FTD as well.&amp;nbsp; Note SDWAN can be automated for egress only tunnel connections at this time 2025-09&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Secure Access also has additional features not included in Secure Connect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:29:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/secure-access-discussions/secure-access-vs-secure-connect/m-p/5329371#M68</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Telford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-11T16:29:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

