<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Secure Access Posturing in Secure Access Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/secure-access-discussions/secure-access-posturing/m-p/5338191#M81</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a roadmap for secure access regarding posturing for managed and unmanaged devices without using duo? Since duo has the capability for that such trusted endpoint and separate posturing for managed and unmanaged. In our case, we don't want to use duo since we have own MFA&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 04:15:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dianawinsky</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-14T04:15:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Secure Access Posturing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/secure-access-discussions/secure-access-posturing/m-p/5338191#M81</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a roadmap for secure access regarding posturing for managed and unmanaged devices without using duo? Since duo has the capability for that such trusted endpoint and separate posturing for managed and unmanaged. In our case, we don't want to use duo since we have own MFA&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 04:15:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/secure-access-discussions/secure-access-posturing/m-p/5338191#M81</guid>
      <dc:creator>dianawinsky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-14T04:15:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

