01-08-2023 11:53 PM
We have an existing ACI multi-pod with two pod's, POD-1 & POD-2 are interconnected through IPN network. And there is a requirement to add new location as POD-3.
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-09-2023 06:15 AM - edited 01-09-2023 06:27 AM
There's still full peering between all Pods, even if it's a hub topology rather than full mesh. Just means if Pod1 fails, then the other two Pods will be unable to communicate (not a best practice). If possible should try to have a dedicated IPN each site can link into so this doesn't happen.
Regards,
Robert
01-09-2023 02:05 AM
As long as the routing table in the IPN is reaching all spines from all pods, then it is supported.
Take care,
Sergiu
01-09-2023 06:15 AM - edited 01-09-2023 06:27 AM
There's still full peering between all Pods, even if it's a hub topology rather than full mesh. Just means if Pod1 fails, then the other two Pods will be unable to communicate (not a best practice). If possible should try to have a dedicated IPN each site can link into so this doesn't happen.
Regards,
Robert
01-17-2023 03:32 AM
Thanks Robert & Sergiu, for your inputs !!!!
Considering the failure scenario, we are planning for the dedicated IPN network on POD-3. POD-3 to POD-1 it's goanna be DWDM link and POD-3 to POD-2 will be through MPLS connectivity.
Can you redirect me to cisco docs, in case you guys have come across on 3 node service layer clustering (both FW/LB, active/active) one in each pod.
Thanks
Karthick
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide