02-14-2020 04:03 AM - edited 02-14-2020 04:03 AM
Hi,
Per the documentation, every time ACI receives a TCN BPDU, it flushes the endpoint database for the EPG associated with the VLAN where the TCN came from. This makes sense when the ACI fabric is dual connected with the legacy network through two different leafs (without VPC), to avoid traffic blackholing when one of the legacy paths fails and the traffic must go through the alternative leaf.
However, when there is a single VPC between two leafs and two legacy switches (also in VPC), there is no alternate paths and TCN BPDUs will flush the endpoints for nothing, causing traffic flapping in ACI. Should I configure the VPC port at the legacy switches side as "spanning-tree portfast trunk" to prevent BPDUs from reaching ACI to avoid EP flushing? Would this cause any risk? My set-up uses MST, but I assume this is not relevant in this case.
Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-14-2020 05:19 AM
Hi @Antonio Macia ,
Yes, if you are sure there won't be any other Legacy connections, you can definitely do that.
No specific risk, but like on traditional switches with no-loop design, some prefer to keep spanning tree to prevent an unexpected loop caused by miscabling/misconfiguration.
02-14-2020 05:19 AM
Hi @Antonio Macia ,
Yes, if you are sure there won't be any other Legacy connections, you can definitely do that.
No specific risk, but like on traditional switches with no-loop design, some prefer to keep spanning tree to prevent an unexpected loop caused by miscabling/misconfiguration.
02-14-2020 05:53 AM
Thank you Remi.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide