cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
209
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
Highlighted
Beginner

Horizontal scaling inside a Data Center (Intra-DC) in ACI

A Design Questions:

Whats the difference of scaling horizontally inside a data-center (Intra-DC) in the ACI Architecture, between the 2 following Architectures?

 

A- Using the ACI Multi-POD Architecture?MultiPOD.JPG

 

 

B- Using the ACI Leaf-Spine-SuperspineCapture.JPG

 

 

According to the following picture, are both these architectures the same, for Intra DC Architecture?


ALLMULTIPOD.JPG

 

1 REPLY 1
Highlighted
Cisco Employee

Re: Horizontal scaling inside a Data Center (Intra-DC) in ACI

Hello.  They may look similar but there is a subtle but important difference.  I will try my best to articulate it.

The "super-spine" topology was offered mostly for certain large customers who were already heavily invested in a cable plant designed for the classic three-tier approach (i.e before ACI became a thing).  In those cases, the cost of recabling could end up costing more than the fabric itself.  So, to give flexibility and options using the existing cable plant, they can opt for the super-spine approach.  Note that this architecture assumes everything is in the same DC or within metro fiber distance where dark fiber / DWDM is readily and cheaply available (yes, I know the words 'cheap' and 'dark fiber' are almost impossible in the same sentence).  The pods referenced are more to show that in large installations, the DC might be spread out over a few nearby, but different buildings.  The point to make here is that there is no WAN involved.

In case of Multi-Pod and Multi-Site, the design assumes multiple DCs that are more geographically distant from each other, thus needing a WAN suitable to handle the DC interconnect.  The attractive thing about how ACI does it, is this WAN can be any generic L3 routed network using equipment from any vendor.  There are some basic requirements**, like a larger MTU, OSPF, DHCP Relay and in the case of Multi-Pod, PIM-BiDir.  As long as those requirements are met, ACI can simply run MP-BGP as the control plane and VxLAN as the dataplane between PODs or Sites.  This is a very simple and graceful, non-complex DCI and I like it very much.  We can go greater distances and use networks like MPLS from our service providers.

Hope that helps

 

** Always read the release notes and config guide for exact details