cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
524
Views
10
Helpful
1
Replies

CSCuv91356 - IOS XE for Cisco 4000 ISR Routers Privileged EXEC Mode Root Shell Access Vulnerability

NickJones12551
Level 1
Level 1

Hi. On the bug ID page, for train and first fixed release, there is:
| 3.13S | 3.13.0aS, 3.13.2aS, 3.13.5aS, 3.13.7aS, 3.13.9S |
| 3.16S | 3.16.2aS, 3.16.2bS, 3.16.3S |
| 16.3 | 16.3.5b, 16.3.6 |
| 16.6 | 16.6.3

Would 3.13.1aS be vulnerable? Are there any vulnerable versions between 3.16.2aS and 3.16.2bS (can someone provide an example)? And are there any vulnerable versions between 16.3.5b and 16.3.6 (with an example)?

Thank you.

 

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Leo Laohoo
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Raise a TAC Case -- The information found in the Bug ID and the Security Bulletin is not clear.
NOTE: I wouldn't be going around running a router on the rebuild version of 3.13.1s. Look at the last "digit" of the version: It is a "1". This means it is prone to be buggy.
Look for a version where the last digit is higher than "3", like "4" and above.

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

Leo Laohoo
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Raise a TAC Case -- The information found in the Bug ID and the Security Bulletin is not clear.
NOTE: I wouldn't be going around running a router on the rebuild version of 3.13.1s. Look at the last "digit" of the version: It is a "1". This means it is prone to be buggy.
Look for a version where the last digit is higher than "3", like "4" and above.
Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: