cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2553
Views
5
Helpful
5
Replies

With upgrade of WLC to 8.3.143 : CDP-4DUPLEX_MISMATCH: error is showing up.

Sharath Karpur
Level 1
Level 1

Dear All, 

 

I have just upgraded my test LAB WLC from 8.2.166.0 to 8.3.143.0 and observing AP connected switch ports are logging below error. ( I am not much convinced for removing CDP configuration and increasing the syslog severity level)

 

I am sure this because of upgrade, I went to through some blogs of similar post. But my question is what will be the stable release that I should go for ? ( i have 2505, 5508 & 5520 WLC's ).  Could you please suggest.

 

082621: Sep 6 08:04:56.048 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/0/45 (not half duplex), with AP GigabitEthernet0 (half duplex).
082622: Sep 6 08:05:21.633 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/0/46 (not half duplex), with AP GigabitEthernet0 (half duplex).
082623: Sep 6 08:05:52.556 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/0/45 (not half duplex), with AP GigabitEthernet0 (half duplex).
082624: Sep 6 08:06:15.562 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/0/46 (not half duplex), with AP GigabitEthernet0 (half duplex).
082625: Sep 6 08:06:52.940 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/0/45 (not half duplex), with AP GigabitEthernet0 (half duplex).
082626: Sep 6 08:07:13.727 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/0/46 (not half duplex), with AP GigabitEthernet0 (half duplex).
082627: Sep 6 08:07:53.091 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/0/45 (not half duplex), with AP GigabitEthernet0 (half duplex).
082628: Sep 6 08:08:10.648 UTC: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/0/46 (not half duplex), with AP GigabitEthernet0 (half duplex).

 

Regards

Sharath

 

5 Replies 5

Leo Laohoo
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

This is a very, very popular bug:  CSCve98689, CSCvi02106, CSCvg42928, CSCvj57770

I recommend raising a TAC case so TAC can confirm/verify which of the Bug IDs you're hitting.

some blogs suggest to upgrade to 8.5.135 as it is know as some stable release.. would you also think so and Do you have this version running in your systems ?

Any known bug with 8.5.135 release ? 

 

Also in the release notes of 8.5.135 they say we can upgrade directly from 8.2.16X to 8.5.131.0. is that also mean that we can upgrade directly to 8.5.135 release ? or its restricted to 8.5.131 only ? 

 

could someone please clarify.

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn85mr3.html#whats-new-in-8dot5mr3

 


@Sharath Karpur wrote:

Also in the release notes of 8.5.135 they say we can upgrade directly from 8.2.16X to 8.5.131.0. is that also mean that we can upgrade directly to 8.5.135 release ? or its restricted to 8.5.131 only  


Read the Release Notes.  It will state that you can go direct to 8.5.135.0 from 8.2.X.X.

I am also hitting the same bug even after upgrading to 8.5.135.0 . 

As per TAC this is resolved in 8.8.xx or the workaround is to disable LAG