Created by: null on 28-09-2004 10:20:27 AM Does "complete" logging add any notable overhead on the application server processor and/or disk IO activity? Is there a quantifiable or indicative number of concurrent calls that a given piece of hardware will be reduced by?
Thanks in advance.
Subject: RE: Overhead for "complete" logging Replied by: null on 28-09-2004 10:06:05 PM Unfortunately, we do not have any benchmarks on how much overhead the logging takes, but we do have plans on doing load tests to determine this figure.
There is overhead considerations when doing logging, just like there is for application server logging. There are a couple of considerations, though:
The overhead involved in opening and closing files is typically larger than actually writing to the logs. The Audium Server opens up a single log file per application and keeps that file open. It does not repeatedly open and close the file. Additionally, these files are opened when the application server is started and when the next log rotation happens (midnight), so there is minimal overhead here.
In the default installation, Audium uses a logging memory cache. When a logging event occurs, instead of storing that directly in the log, it is stored in the cache, which has a tiny amount of overhead. Only when the cache is filled or the call ends does that data actually get stored in the log, in one large chunk. So this would cut down on the overhead logging would normally inflict. There is still some, but not as much as if each logging event stored data in the log directly (which would happen if you make the logging cache small). So we trade memory usage for better performance. Again, we do not have a quantification of this improvement.
The size of the typical amount of data stored in the logs is very small, on the order of a single line of text. The only time there would be a lot of content stored in the log is if the developer themselves stored a lot or there is a stack trace printed in the error log. Even in these cases, we are not talking about 5-10K, it is usually less.
I'm using CUPI to try and updates a mailbox password. So I PUT to https://srvcucn12s.nxodev.intra:443/vmrest/users/d65583a1-3da2-4fcd-b655-4beb896791df/credential/passwordwith this content<Credential><Credentials>my password here<...
view more
Hello All, Below is my scenario Extension A is observed Caller calls from PSTN to Extension A Extension A rings and A Rejects the call.I am using call.drop() to reject the call. When I invoke this, the call seems to disconnec...
view more
(using Python and the Flask Library)
An oAuth integration allows you to have an application "do stuff on your behalf".
This is a topic that can be quite complex to understand. For that reason I created this Python code to make it as easy as possible to...
view more
It may be easier than you think.
After some customer requests I started writing code in Python. A few days later the script was ready.
What can it do?
ADD LOGO or image to your virtual background (using a domain/email address/URL/local-file)
AD...
view more
Howdy! Adding everything I need through a python script to spin up a site in CUCM. When adding a common phone config it seems to be ignoring a vendorConfig piece I want to modify. # Create commonPhoneConfig siteCode_locatio...
view more
