A company currently has two different UC environments. One in the US and one in the UK. The US UC environment has (3) CUCM servers (Publisher and 2 subscribers), (2) IMP servers (Publisher and Subscriber), (2) Unity Connection servers (Publisher and Subscriber), (2) UCCX servers (Publisher and Subscriber) and (2) Cisco Emergency Responder servers (Publisher and Subscriber). Our US environment is doing cluster over WAN for all the systems between two different Data Centers - Lewis Center (primary DC) and Cincinnati (secondary DC). We have plenty of available bandwidth between the two DCs and about a 10ms round-trip time so well within any requirements for clustering of UC systems. The US environment is all running versions that are in-line with the CSR12.5/12.6 versions.
UK environment as it is a single site only has a single CUCM server, a single IMP server and a single Unity Connection server. For internet connectivity they go through our same two US Data Centers. Due to old hardware (which will be replaced shortly) they are still running versions consistent with the CSR12.0. Hardware order is actually expected to be ordered very shortly and at that time they will be upgraded to CSR12.5/12.6 consistent with the US environment.
They have ICSA running between the US and UK IMP servers. Their goal is right now is to provide Hybrid Messaging in order to have an eventual transition from Cisco Jabber to Cisco Webex teams. Based on conversations with their Sales team and the roadmap sessions I attend under the CCP program they are seeing the writing on the wall that Jabber will eventually go away and Webex Teams is the future. Once Webex teams can be used as the CSF device and directly replace Jabber as the softphone of choice they would eventually migrate all of their users from Jabber to Webex teams. What they doing now is preparing for that eventuality and providing a migration path by configuring the Hybrid Messaging so Jabber users and Webex teams users can communicate with each other. This would be considered a temporary requirement as once everyone is migrated to Webex teams we would no longer need the Hybrid Messaging. The solution they are looking to deploy from the deployment guide is the "One Expressway Connector cluster to multiple IM and Presence service clusters" - Figure 8 in the document. In their case IMP Publisher 1 would be their US cluster and IMP Publisher 2 would be the UK cluster. Their clusters are pretty small - 487 users in the US IMP cluster and 47 users in the UK IMP cluster so being able to use a single expressway-c cluster to serve both of these clusters would be preferable.
The way our DC and internet connectivity is set-up, we have the two DCs with an MPLS connection between them. Each Data Center has an internet circuit with each one having independent external addressing. Currently they have only installed an Expressway-C in our Lewis Center DC. For redundancy purposes they would like to also install a second Expressway-C in the second Cincinnati DC and cluster them. This is where most of the questions come from and here is some further details to the questions.
Last login: Tue Sep 15 13:28:16 EDT 2020 from 192.168.62.238on pts/0 ~ # xconfig H323 Mode: "On" -sh: xconfig: command not found ~ #
b. To meet the requirement that each peer has a certificate that identifies it to the other peers, does this required a CA-signed certificate or is there a self-signed certificate by default that can be used for this as long as this remains with TLS verification mode set to Permissive. Based on my reading of this (same step as the previous question) I believe as long as I leave this set to permissive that the cluster would form regardless of whether I have CA-signed certificates. Considering this would be used for a transition period I would prefer not to have to purchase CA-signed certificates. I just want to make sure there is not the need for this and if I don't have CA-signed certificates that this just requires me to leave the setting to "Permissive".
d. Is there a need for DNS SRV records for an Expressway-C cluster used solely for Hybrid Messaging? If so how does this need to be set-up exactly? Is this only for clustering internally or is a DNS SRV record of some sort needed for both servers in the cluster to communicate with the cloud? The same Step 6 in the guide simply talks about configuring the FQDN for the cluster and says "typically this FQDN is mapped by an SRV record in DNS that resolves to A/AAAA records for the cluster peers". Really just looking to understand exactly how this needs to be set-up keeping in mind we are ONLY looking to do Hybrid Messaging and nothing else. Secondly, is this something used internally only for the clustering or do we need to also have some sort of DNS SRV record on the internet as well.
2. Is a signed public-CA certificate required on the Expressway-C to communicate with the Webex cloud? Is a signed public-CA certificate required for the cluster or the individual servers to communicate with our CUCM/IMP? The anticipation is that long term we would migrate everyone from Jabber/IMP to Webex Teams with their Webex Teams registered as a CSF device in CUCM (once available) and the Hybrid Messaging would no longer be needed, so if public-CA signed certificates are not needed would rather not purchase.
3. From what they reading, all communication between the Expressway-C and the cloud is initiated from the Expressway, so we do not need to open any holes inbound on our firewall, correct?
hello friends, I've gone through this explanation https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-voice-and-video/implementing-phone-background-images-for-cisco-ip-phones/ta-p/3115140 but you know, there is one action remaining, which is...
In native call queuing custom announcements are not heard. When selecting the built-in messages these are working properly. Custom announcements have been uploaded to all nodes and voice media streaming has been reset.
Hi Guys We will be implementing Multimedia Contact Center of Email and Chat Agents. On the CCW, I could not see the SocialMiner as a licensed component but can noted that SocialMiner is referenced in the Cisco Live presentations. I will be most ...
Hi Guys We are about to install the Collaboration Flex Named Users - which entitles us to 5 devices per User. Is it possible for us to configure it in the manner below. User A, Extension Number 1000The User will have Deskphone, Jabber(Full UC) o...