cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Answer Questions

  • Duplicate Messages - ( 01-11-2001 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • I have an interesting problem, one person is getting duplicate voice mail messages in thier outlook inbox, and not all voice mails are duplicated, for example he came in today and had 5 new voice messages, 2 were duplicates. he only checks his voice mail through outlook,so i do not know if they are duplicated through the phone.<br><br>Any thoughts<br><br>Thanks<br><br>
    View more
01-11-2001
Cancel Post

  • *Looking for feedback on new UI designs* - ( 01-10-2001 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • Hey folks… now’s your chance to get some direct input into the UI of Unity… if you’re going to be in the Seattle area in the next month or so, our UI guys would love to have you swing by and run you through some new designs just coming out of the oven. If you’re interested, ping Matt at the email noted below.<br><br>============================<br><br>Active Voice is looking for volunteers to help with the usability testing of its unified messaging products at our Seattle location. We are asking for one hour of participation in exchange for a $50 gift certificate to amazon.com. Participants will perform some tasks using one of our products and then tell us how we can make it better.<br><br>We currently have openings for the following dates:<br><br> 1/15 - 1/19 sessions start anytime between 8am to 3pm<br> 1/22 - 1/26 sessions start anytime between 8am to 6pm.<br> 1/29 - 2/2 sessions start anytime between 8am to 6pm.<br> <br><br>If you are interested in one of the these sessions send email to Matt Dallas at mdallas@activevoice.com. State the date and time you are interested in attending. If you are the first volunteer for a session, you will receive an e-mail confirmation along with directions to Active Voice. We provide validated parking at our building.<br><br><br>Jeff Lindborg<br>Unity Product Architect<br>Active Voice<br>jlindborg@activevoice.com<br><A HREF="http://members.home.net/jlindborg" target="_new">http://members.home.net/jlindborg</A>
    View more
01-10-2001
Cancel Post

  • URL visited Logs - ( 01-09-2001 )
  • Other Security Subjects
  • HI,I am working for a ISP we have a following setup at one of our NAP,A Cisco As 5300 RAS, Cisco 3640 and we have a 2 MB Gateway connectivity from a service provider.A law in India needs me to show the CLI and the websites visited by our subscribers.Unfortunately we dont have any proxy servers in place so that we can capture that data.Is there any way of capturing the said data from a AS 5300 or the router.Thanks Erfan
    View more
01-09-2001
Cancel Post

  • Please Help - ( 01-09-2001 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • HI,<br><br>We have an urgent problem but our support agreement has not gone through yet. So Please help.<br><br>We use Unity 2.4 with Cisco CallManager 3.0.3b. Our Untiy is a part of our Exchange so everybody's Inbox is stored on our Exchange servers. We use 6 CallManager uOne ports for Unity, 4 ports for Call and 2 for MWI and such. We found out that once for a while the MWI lights for all the phones in are not turned on, even though our users have new voice messages in their Inbox. I have to either Resync or reset the ports that handle the MWI lights. (I tried to test for all the ports in Telephony in Control Panel and the test runs fine). Below is the warning messages from NT event log on Unity server:<br><br>Event ID: 521<br>Source: AcMiu_MC<br><br>Description<br>Component Miu: Thread 0x0000022C had a Failure on Port 6 in Method CAvTSPAbstraction::Selsius_SetMWI()<br><br>DESCRIPTION: HardFailure from lineDevSpecific.<br>DETAILS: <br> DestAddress: 8020<br> Messages: 0<br> State: OFF<br> ErrorCode: 0x80000048. <br><br><br>Event ID: 521<br>Source: AcMiu_MC<br><br>Description<br>Component Miu: Thread 0x0000022C had a Failure on Port 5 in Method CAvTSPAbstraction::Selsius_SetMWI()<br><br>DESCRIPTION: HardFailure from lineDevSpecific.<br>DETAILS: <br> DestAddress: 2309<br> Messages: 0<br> State: OFF<br> ErrorCode: 0x80000048. <br><br>Please help. Thanks.<br><br><br><br>
    View more
01-09-2001
Cancel Post

  • *Client versions tested with VMO* - ( 01-09-2001 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • Hey gang. <br>Last week I promised we'd post a list of all the Outlook patches we tested VMO against since that question comes up fairly often. Our fabulous QA folks send this to me... lots of patches to test against.<br><br>anyway, here's the list... <br><br>====================================<br>Outlook 2000<br>Updated 128-Bit Encryption Provider for Outlook 2000 SR-1 <br>http://office.microsoft.com/2000/downloaddetails/Out128.htm<br><br>Office 2000 ODBC Driver Vulnerability Security Update <br>http://office.microsoft.com/2000/downloaddetails/excel2000odbc.htm<br><br>Office 2000 Service Release 1a (SR-1a) Update <br>http://office.microsoft.com/2000/downloaddetails/O2kSR1DDL.htm<br><br>Office 2000 Security Update: UA Control Vulnerability <br>http://office.microsoft.com/2000/downloaddetails/Uactlsec.htm<br><br>Outlook 2000 SR-1 Update: E-mail Security <br>http://office.microsoft.com/2000/downloaddetails/Out2ksec.htm<br><br>Outlook 2000 Collaboration Data Objects (CDO) Update: Security <br>http://office.microsoft.com/2000/downloaddetails/Cdo2k.htm<br><br>Outlook 2000 SR-1 Update: MultiLanguage Pack E-mail Security <br>http://office.microsoft.com/2000/downloaddetails/LPKSec.htm<br><br>Office 2000 Update: Service Pack 2 (SP-2)<br>http://office.microsoft.com/2000/downloaddetails/SP2upd.htm<br><br>Outlook 98<br>Outlook 98 Collaboration Data Objects (CDO) Update: Security <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/Cdoup98.htm<br><br>Outlook 98 Update: E-mail Security <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/Out98sec.htm<br><br>Outlook 98 Patch: United Kingdom 020 Area Code Update <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/Ol98uk.htm<br><br>Outlook 98 Archive Patch <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/arch98en.htm<br><br>Forms 2.0 Control Security Patch <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/fm2paste.htm<br><br>Outlook 98 Patch: Importer Field Mapping<br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/field98.htm<br><br>Outlook 98 Update: E-mail Security <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/outptch2.htm<br><br>Outlook 97<br>Outlook 97 Update: Internet Mail Enhancement Patch <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/outlimep.htm<br><br>Office 97 Service Release 1 (SR-1) <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/sr1off97detail.htm<br><br>Office 97 Service Release 2 ValuPack<br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/off97vpk.htm<br><br>Outlook 97 Archive Patch <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/arch97en.htm<br><br>Office 97 Service Release 2b (SR-2b) <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/sr2off97detail.htm<br><br>Office 97 ODBC Driver Vulnerability Security Update <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/excel97odbc.htm<br><br>Outlook 97 Email Attachment Security Update <br>http://office.microsoft.com/downloaddetails/O97attch.htm<br><br><br>Jeff Lindborg<br>Unity Product Architect<br>Active Voice<br>jlindborg@activevoice.com<br><A HREF="http://members.home.net/jlindborg" target="_new">http://members.home.net/jlindborg</A>
    View more
01-09-2001
Cancel Post

  • Using Policy Manager and CVS for secure management - ( 01-05-2001 )
  • Other Security Subjects
  • Can Policy Manager 2.2 and Content Verification System 3.3.1 be used for secure management of PIX firewalls and Local Directors?What kind of traffic do they use? HTTP or SNMP?If they use HTTP how can this be secured if management traffic is flowing over the same links as public user traffic?Regards
    View more
01-05-2001
Cancel Post

  • Web Management - ( 01-04-2001 )
  • Other Security Subjects
  • Is there any body tried to Manage(by using Browser) Catalyst 2924XL with IOS version 12.0(5.2XU).If yes, then pls check the html file bytes in flash, because i am getting only 6720 bytes in switch flash and not able Manage it by Browsing. Any info will be appreciated.
    View more
01-04-2001
Cancel Post

  • * Unity 2.4.5 build 73 released to production * - ( 12-29-2000 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • Unity 2.4.5 build 73 was released to production this week. This is the patch release we promised for 2.4.5 a couple of weeks ago to support the simple fail over configurations which were not working properly in the first production drop of 2.4.5.<br><br>In addition to the fail over support, this drop has a few miscellaneous bug fixes for:<br>NMS T1 problems<br>serial integration issues with Calista (mostly timing parameter options were added)<br>Fixes for release transfer problems across Call Manager clusters.<br>Couple of minor SA and reports fixes<br><br>This build should be available from production next week. <br><br><br>Jeff Lindborg<br>Unity Product Architect<br>Active Voice<br>jlindborg@activevoice.com<br><A HREF="http://members.home.net/jlindborg" target="_new">http://members.home.net/jlindborg</A>
    View more
12-29-2000
Cancel Post

  • MWI not working in CM 3.02d and Unity 2.45 install - ( 12-27-2000 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • I have a customer running Call Manager 3.02d and Unity 2.45 with the latest TSP 1.0.0.24.exe. MWI's are not working. I can troubleshoot that the MWI on and off is working against the CM. I have the on/off set within the TSP and on/off set on the CM. Are there any other settings that I may be missing to get this to work.<br><br><br><br>
    View more
12-27-2000
Cancel Post

  • Problems with PIX 520 Implementation - ( 12-26-2000 )
  • Other Security Subjects
  • (Note: This message was posted as part of the "Ask the Expert" Event on configuring Cisco IPSec VPNs that took place December 11 - December 21. Feel free to respond to or form discussions around this question.)Posted by: davesiwula@ yahoo.com - INTERNET SECURITY ENGINEER, NETWORK RANGERI have implemented a PIX 520 into production and have been experiencing a problem with it. It appears that someone from the outside has been able to sneak in a telnet packet after lets say 50 or so normal packets pass through. If a legitimate connection is established from the outside world, and fifty or so packets come from a legitimate source and the source address, destination address all remain the same. Then the port on the 50th packet is changed from http 80 to 23 telnet. Is there anything I can to prevent this from happening? Does the pix inspect every single packet by default? Does this have to do with it being stateful? I need to prevent my network from these kinds of issues. Please advise. Also could you inform me of how the PIX handles packets that are lets say less than the normal size? Thanks for your time. One more thing if you have time: I am very confused on a ip fragment attack, sig id 1110 Generally speaking I understand what it is but I have been not been able to understand the greater than 0 less than 5 rule for the life of me. I have disected the ip packet in every possible and cannot figure this out. How does the value of 1 through 4 trigger in the fragment offset field trigger this alarm? Why is 0 and 5 in this field considered normal? Does 1 represent 8 bits, 2 16 bits and so on? If so I am still lost? Thanks for your help. David Siwula CCNP+security CCDP
    View more
12-26-2000
Cancel Post

  • Design Question - ( 12-26-2000 )
  • Other Security Subjects
  • (Note: This message was posted as part of the "Ask the Expert" Event on configuring Cisco IPSec VPNs that took place December 11 - December 21. Feel free to respond to or form discussions around this question.)Posted by: todilley - IKON TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, CCIEDesign question - I have three 3005s. The 'hub' site is connected in parallel to the PIX. (Outside int on the outside segment, inside int on the inside network, my preferred way to connect them.) The two remote sites only have an internet router directly connected to the inside network. Can I connect both the inside and outside interfaces onto the inside network (same subnet)? One site is using public address space on the inside network. That may work, I haven't connected that site yet. The other site is using private IP space on the inside and the internet router is NATing the inside addresses to the public address being used on the Dialer (ISDN) interface using overload. This is the site I am currently having problems with. Should this work if I add a static NAT statement for the 3005 outside interface? Should/Could I use a secondary network on the router to talk to the outside interface of the 3005 on a different subnet? (The internet router is a 1600 that belongs to the ISP or maybe I could terminate the tunnel on the router?) Any suggestions/comments? Thanks!
    View more
12-26-2000
Cancel Post

  • CiscoWorks2000 discovery map and level 3 analysis - ( 12-15-2000 )
  • Other Security Subjects
  • I installed Resource Manager Essentials and CWSI campus on Solaris two months ago.Till now in the discovery map I found Cisco switches an routers . In which way can I display (discover) any other network device attached to the ports of Cisco Switches ? Can I discover or display switches and routers non Cisco ?Another question is : can I do layel 3 analysis on packets switched by routers or switch ( ip addresses and byte count for billing)?Thanks
    View more
12-15-2000
Cancel Post

12-14-2000
Cancel Post

  • Cisco Secure - ( 12-13-2000 )
  • Other Security Subjects
  • I have Cisco 3600, which works as my access server for remote users to dial in. I am using Cisco Secure ACS NT 4.0 for the users to get in the newtork using my existing NT account database, and this is working fine. Now I want to install Cisco ACS on nother machine which is on different network( segment). And want some of the users to get authenticated from this Cisco ACS machine and gett'n IP address from this segment. How can i place nother pool of ip on my Cisco 3600 and when a user tries to log in it is authenticated thru the new ACS. U c the old segement has all public IP, now i want nother pool of private Ip already in my network to be assigned to dialup users...and wanna keep the old one. I will in future get rid of the old ACS but for now wanna keep both...some 1 help
    View more
12-13-2000
Cancel Post

12-11-2000
Cancel Post

  • Restrict access with tacacs+ on 5000 catalyst - ( 12-11-2000 )
  • Other Security Subjects
  • I have created somes group with tacacs.For one group, i want they have NO ACCESS to some catalyst. When i restrict access, it works, but not in 5000 catalyst. If the user have a user ID, he can have access on all 5000 catalyst, even i remove the access on that user ID. ? why ? Are those catalyst support that feature ?Thanks !
    View more
12-11-2000
Cancel Post

12-08-2000
Cancel Post

  • * Bulk Edit updated for 2.4.5 * - ( 12-06-2000 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • The Bulk Edit utility on the web page was updated to handle new 2.4.5 features tonight.<br><br>Version 2.4.76 now handles language assignment (for both subscriber and outside caller) and switch assignment for subscribers, call handlers and each individual notification device. <br><br>The new options are only enabled if you're running the BEU on version 2.4.5 or later and you have more than one switch configured and/or you have more than one language installed.<br><br>enjoy.<br><br><br>Jeff Lindborg<br>Unity Product Architect<br>Active Voice<br>jlindborg@activevoice.com<br><A HREF="http://members.home.net/jlindborg" target="_new">http://members.home.net/jlindborg</A>
    View more
12-06-2000
Cancel Post

  • VPN: does filter rules apply also to the encrypted network? - ( 12-06-2000 )
  • Other Security Subjects
  • question: consider a site to site VPN with somecisco equipment, let's say A and B establish a VPN.since i cannot rely on the propper security setup ofmy VPN neighbors, is it possible to apply firewall /filter rules also to the tunnel? or do i need adedicated firewall for this approach? i want to protect my VPN from the rest of the world, and want to protect A from B vv., or at least restrict access by IP or services. some VPN devicesfrom other vendors can't do that, only one i've foundyet is biodata. thanks for any help,udo
    View more
12-06-2000
Cancel Post

  • * Unity 2.4.5 Released to Production * - ( 12-03-2000 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • Unity 2.4.5 was released to production Friday afternoon. It will be available for order in about 5 business days.<br><br>The simple fail over feature, however, had a last minute problem with the build we selected to release. Rather than hold the release, we’ll get a CPR point release in place in the next couple weeks to address the problem.<br><br><br><br>Jeff Lindborg<br>Unity Product Architect<br>Active Voice<br>jlindborg@activevoice.com<br><A HREF="http://members.home.net/jlindborg" target="_new">http://members.home.net/jlindborg</A>
    View more
12-03-2000
Cancel Post

  • Win2k Service Pack 1 influence on Win2k VPN client setup - ( 12-02-2000 )
  • Other Security Subjects
  • We have had Windows 2000 VPN clients running IPSec / LT2P VPN tunnels to IOS router, running IOS 12.0(7)T, for some time. After the upgrade of the Windows 2000 workstation with Windows 2000 service pack 1, the Windows 2000 VPN client does not succeed in the PPP negotiation after establishing the IPSec and L2TP tunnel to the IOS router, appearently because the VPN client insists on performing call back in the PPP LCP negotiation. See part of output of debug vpdn ev, debug vpdn er, deb vpdn l2x-ev, deb vpdn l2x-er and deb ppp nego beneath. First is shown output of the above debug commands for a Windows 2000 VPN client, where Windows 2000 service pack 1 has not been loaded. PPP negotiation and L2TP tunnel establishment is succesfull. Next is shown the same for a Windows 2000 VPN client, where Windows 2000 service pack has been loaded. For this VPN client PPP negotiation and L2TP tunnel establishment is unsuccessful.IPSec tunnel establishment is not affected by the installation of service pack 1.I ask for proposals for necessary setup changes in the Windows VPN client and / or IOS router for VPN clients on Windows 2000 machines with service pack 1. I could not at my first search find any relevant information on the Microsoft Web site.Best regardsJesper Munk, Tele Denmark, e-mail jmunk@tdk.dk.Output of debug vpnd er and ev, vpdn l2x-er and l2x-ev, debug ppp nego with and without succesful PPP negotiation.COMMENT: WINDOWS 2000 VPN CLIENT, WHERE WINDOWS 2000 SERVICE PACK 1 HAS NOT BEEN LOADED. PPP NEGOTIATION AND L2TP TUNNEL ESTABLISHMENT IS SUCCESSFUL....Nov 21 15:13:40.066: L2TP: packet with callid 1 but no matching session...Nov 21 15:13:40.639: Tnl 1 L2TP: O Resend CDN, flg TLF, ver 2, len 46, tnl 4, cl 1, ns 2, nr 4Nov 21 15:13:40.639: Tnl 1 L2TP: Control channel retransmit delay set to 4 seconds....Nov 21 15:13:44.069: L2TP: packet with callid 1 but no matching session....Nov 21 15:13:44.642: Tnl 1 L2TP: O Resend CDN, flg TLF, ver 2, len 46, tnl 4, cl 1, ns 2, nr 4Nov 21 15:13:44.642: Tnl 1 L2TP: Control channel retransmit delay set to 8 secondsNov 21 15:13:45.195: L2TP: I SCCRQ from IT00730 tnl 1Nov 21 15:13:45.195: L2X: Never heard of IT00730Nov 21 15:13:45.195: Tnl 2 L2TP: New tunnel created for remote IT00730, address 194.239.197.130Nov 21 15:13:45.199: Tnl 2 L2TP: O SCCRP to IT00730 tnlid 1Nov 21 15:13:45.199: Tnl 2 L2TP: Tunnel state change from idle to wait-ctl-replyNov 21 15:13:45.860: Tnl 2 L2TP: I SCCCN from IT00730 tnl 1Nov 21 15:13:45.860: Tnl 2 L2TP: Tunnel state change from wait-ctl-reply to establishedNov 21 15:13:45.860: Tnl 2 L2TP: SM State establishedNov 21 15:13:45.964: Tnl 2 L2TP: I ICRQ from IT00730 tnl 1Nov 21 15:13:45.964: Tnl/Cl 2/2 L2TP: Session sequencing disabledNov 21 15:13:45.964: Tnl/Cl 2/2 L2TP: Session FS enabledNov 21 15:13:45.964: Tnl/Cl 2/2 L2TP: Session state change from idle to wait-connectNov 21 15:13:45.968: Tnl/Cl 2/2 L2TP: New session createdNov 21 15:13:45.968: Tnl/Cl 2/2 L2TP: O ICRP to IT00730 1/1Nov 21 15:13:46.577: Tnl/Cl 2/2 L2TP: I ICCN from IT00730 tnl 1, cl 1Nov 21 15:13:46.577: Tnl/Cl 2/2 L2TP: Session state change from wait-connect to establishedNov 21 15:13:46.577: Vi1 VPDN: Virtual interface created for Nov 21 15:13:46.577: Vi1 PPP: Phase is DOWN, SetupNov 21 15:13:46.577: Vi1 VPDN: Clone from Vtemplate 1 filterPPP=0 blockingNov 21 15:13:46.978: Tnl/Cl 2/2 L2TP: Session with no hwidbNov 21 15:13:47.010: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to upNov 21 15:13:47.014: Vi1 PPP: Treating connection as a dedicated lineNov 21 15:13:47.014: Vi1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active OpenNov 21 15:13:47.014: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 1 len 15Nov 21 15:13:47.018: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:47.018: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0680957 (0x0506D0680957)Nov 21 15:13:47.018: Vi1 VPDN: Bind interface direction=2Nov 21 15:13:47.018: Vi1 PPP: Treating connection as a dedicated lineNov 21 15:13:47.018: Vi1 VPDN: Initiated LCP negotiationNov 21 15:13:47.018: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [REQsent] id 2 len 15Nov 21 15:13:47.022: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:47.022: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD068095C (0x0506D068095C)Nov 21 15:13:47.595: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 2 len 15Nov 21 15:13:47.595: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:47.595: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD068095C (0x0506D068095C)Nov 21 15:13:47.851: Tnl 1 L2TP: Control channel has outstanding packets, delaying tunnel shutdown 1Nov 21 15:13:47.851: Tnl 1 L2TP: No more sessions in tunnel, shutdown (likely) in 10 secondsNov 21 15:13:48.071: L2TP: packet with callid 1 but no matching sessionNov 21 15:13:48.624: Vi1 LCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 1 len 44Nov 21 15:13:48.624: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x42F47625 (0x050642F47625)Nov 21 15:13:48.624: Vi1 LCP: PFC (0x0702)Nov 21 15:13:48.624: Vi1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802)Nov 21 15:13:48.624: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:48.624: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:48.628: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:48.628: Vi1 LCP: (0x131701D1EED7B2838A4E33963331DBDB)Nov 21 15:13:48.628: Vi1 LCP: (0x3837FC00000001)Nov 21 15:13:48.628: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREJ [ACKrcvd] id 1 len 34Nov 21 15:13:48.628: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:48.628: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:48.628: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:48.632: Vi1 LCP: (0x131701D1EED7B2838A4E33963331DBDB)Nov 21 15:13:48.632: Vi1 LCP: (0x3837FC00000001)Nov 21 15:13:48.873: IPSEC(decapsulate): error in decapsulation crypto_ipsec_sa_existsNov 21 15:13:49.021: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:49.021: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 3 len 15Nov 21 15:13:49.021: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:49.021: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD068095C (0x0506D068095C)Nov 21 15:13:49.213: Vi1 LCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 2 len 14Nov 21 15:13:49.213: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x42F47625 (0x050642F47625)Nov 21 15:13:49.213: Vi1 LCP: PFC (0x0702)Nov 21 15:13:49.213: Vi1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802)COMMENT: WINDOWS 2000 VPN CLIENT REFRAINS FROM REQUESTING CALL BACK IN THE PPP LCP NEGOTIATION, AS I SEE IT: CALL BACK PARAMETER CALLBACK 6 (0X0D0306) IS OMITTED IN THE I CONFREQ REQUEST RECEIVED AT POINT OF TIME NOV 21 15:13:49.213.Nov 21 15:13:49.217: Vi1 LCP: O CONFACK [REQsent] id 2 len 14Nov 21 15:13:49.217: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x42F47625 (0x050642F47625)Nov 21 15:13:49.217: Vi1 LCP: PFC (0x0702)Nov 21 15:13:49.217: Vi1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802)Nov 21 15:13:49.594: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 3 len 15Nov 21 15:13:49.594: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:49.594: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD068095C (0x0506D068095C)Nov 21 15:13:49.594: Vi1 LCP: State is OpenNov 21 15:13:49.594: Vi1 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by this endNov 21 15:13:49.598: Vi1 CHAP: O CHALLENGE id 1 len 29 from "hx911419"Nov 21 15:13:49.814: Vi1 LCP: I IDENTIFY [Open] id 3 len 18 magic 0x42F47625 MSRASV5.00Nov 21 15:13:49.942: Vi1 LCP: I IDENTIFY [Open] id 4 len 23 magic 0x42F47625 MSRAS-1-IT00730Nov 21 15:13:50.183: Vi1 CHAP: I RESPONSE id 1 len 29 from "onlusr04"Nov 21 15:13:50.187: Vi1 CHAP: O SUCCESS id 1 len 4Nov 21 15:13:50.187: Vi1 PPP: Phase is UPNov 21 15:13:50.187: Vi1 IPCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 1 len 10Nov 21 15:13:50.191: Vi1 IPCP: Address 192.168.250.1 (0x0306C0A8FA01)Nov 21 15:13:50.764: Vi1 CCP: I CONFREQ [Not negotiated] id 5 len 10Nov 21 15:13:50.764: Vi1 CCP: MS-PPC supported bits 0x01000001 (0x120601000001)Nov 21 15:13:50.764: Vi1 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 4 len 16 protocol CCP (0x80FD0105000A120601000001)Nov 21 15:13:50.884: Vi1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 6 len 10Nov 21 15:13:50.884: Vi1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)Nov 21 15:13:50.884: Vi1 IPCP: Pool returned 192.168.250.10Nov 21 15:13:50.884: Vi1 IPCP: O CONFNAK [REQsent] id 6 len 10Nov 21 15:13:50.884: Vi1 IPCP: Address 192.168.250.10 (0x0306C0A8FA0A)Nov 21 15:13:50.972: Vi1 IPCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 1 len 10Nov 21 15:13:50.972: Vi1 IPCP: Address 192.168.250.1 (0x0306C0A8FA01)Nov 21 15:13:51.188: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to upNov 21 15:13:51.441: Vi1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 7 len 10Nov 21 15:13:51.445: Vi1 IPCP: Address 192.168.250.10 (0x0306C0A8FA0A)Nov 21 15:13:51.445: Vi1 IPCP: O CONFACK [ACKrcvd] id 7 len 10Nov 21 15:13:51.445: Vi1 IPCP: Address 192.168.250.10 (0x0306C0A8FA0A)Nov 21 15:13:51.445: Vi1 IPCP: State is OpenNov 21 15:13:51.453: Vi1 IPCP: Install route to 192.168.250.10Nov 21 15:13:52.062: Tnl 1 L2TP: I CDN from IT00639 tnl 4Nov 21 15:13:52.062: Tnl 1 L2TP: Tunnel state change from no-sessions-left to establishedNov 21 15:13:52.062: L2TP: Could not find session processing CDN, even by remote IDNov 21 15:13:52.206: Tnl 1 L2TP: I StopCCN from IT00639 tnl 4Nov 21 15:13:52.206: %VPDN-6-CLOSED: L2TP LAC IT00639 195.249.228.115 closed tunnel ; Result 6, Error 0Nov 21 15:13:52.206: Tnl 1 L2TP: Shutdown tunnelNov 21 15:13:52.206: Tnl 1 L2TP: Tunnel state change from established to idleNov 21 15:13:54.586: ISAKMP (0:3): retransmitting phase 1...Nov 21 15:13:54.586: ISAKMP (3): sending packet to 194.239.197.130 (R) MM_SA_SETUP.....hx911419#sh vpdn sessL2TP Session Information (Total tunnels=1 sessions=1)LocID RemID TunID Intf Username State Last Chg Fastswitch2 1 2 Vi1 onlusr04 est 00:00:33 enabled % No active L2F tunnelshx911419#COMMENT: WINDOWS 2000 VPN CLIENT, WHERE WINDOWS 2000 SERVICE PACK 1 HAS BEEN LOADED. PPP NEGOTIATION AND L2TP TUNNEL ESTABLISHMENT IS UCSUCCESSFUL...Nov 21 15:13:14.548: L2TP: I SCCRQ from IT00639 tnl 4Nov 21 15:13:14.548: L2X: Never heard of IT00639Nov 21 15:13:14.552: Tnl 1 L2TP: New tunnel created for remote IT00639, address 195.249.228.115Nov 21 15:13:14.552: Tnl 1 L2TP: O SCCRP to IT00639 tnlid 4Nov 21 15:13:14.552: Tnl 1 L2TP: Tunnel state change from idle to wait-ctl-replyNov 21 15:13:14.741: Tnl 1 L2TP: I SCCCN from IT00639 tnl 4Nov 21 15:13:14.741: Tnl 1 L2TP: Tunnel state change from wait-ctl-reply to establishedNov 21 15:13:14.741: Tnl 1 L2TP: SM State establishedNov 21 15:13:14.841: Tnl 1 L2TP: I ICRQ from IT00639 tnl 4Nov 21 15:13:14.841: Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: Session sequencing disabledNov 21 15:13:14.841: Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: Session FS enabledNov 21 15:13:14.845: Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: Session state change from idle to wait-connectNov 21 15:13:14.845: Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: New session createdNov 21 15:13:14.845: Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: O ICRP to IT00639 4/1Nov 21 15:13:15.029: Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: I ICCN from IT00639 tnl 4, cl 1Nov 21 15:13:15.033: Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: Session state change from wait-connect to establishedNov 21 15:13:15.149: Vi1 PPP: Phase is DOWN, SetupNov 21 15:13:15.189: Vi1 VPDN: Virtual interface created for Nov 21 15:13:15.193: Vi1 PPP: Phase is DOWN, SetupNov 21 15:13:15.193: Vi1 VPDN: Clone from Vtemplate 1 filterPPP=0 blockingNov 21 15:13:15.434: Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: Session with no hwidbNov 21 15:13:15.606: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to upNov 21 15:13:15.610: Vi1 PPP: Treating connection as a dedicated lineNov 21 15:13:15.610: Vi1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active OpenNov 21 15:13:15.610: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 1 len 15Nov 21 15:13:15.610: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:15.610: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E97 (0x0506D0678E97)Nov 21 15:13:15.614: Vi1 VPDN: Bind interface direction=2Nov 21 15:13:15.614: Vi1 PPP: Treating connection as a dedicated lineNov 21 15:13:15.614: Vi1 VPDN: Initiated LCP negotiationNov 21 15:13:15.614: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [REQsent] id 2 len 15Nov 21 15:13:15.614: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:15.614: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:15.762: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 2 len 15Nov 21 15:13:15.766: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:15.766: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)....Nov 21 15:13:17.028: Vi1 LCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 1 len 44Nov 21 15:13:17.028: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x244434C7 (0x0506244434C7)Nov 21 15:13:17.028: Vi1 LCP: PFC (0x0702)Nov 21 15:13:17.032: Vi1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802)Nov 21 15:13:17.032: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:17.032: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:17.032: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:17.032: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:17.032: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:17.032: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREJ [ACKrcvd] id 1 len 34Nov 21 15:13:17.036: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:17.036: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:17.036: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:17.036: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:17.036: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:17.617: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:17.617: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 3 len 15Nov 21 15:13:17.617: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:17.617: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:17.782: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 3 len 15Nov 21 15:13:17.782: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:17.782: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:19.621: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:19.621: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 4 len 15Nov 21 15:13:19.621: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:19.621: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:19.765: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 4 len 15Nov 21 15:13:19.769: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:19.769: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:20.037: Vi1 LCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 44Nov 21 15:13:20.041: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x244434C7 (0x0506244434C7)Nov 21 15:13:20.041: Vi1 LCP: PFC (0x0702)Nov 21 15:13:20.041: Vi1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802)Nov 21 15:13:20.041: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:20.041: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:20.041: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:20.041: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:20.045: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:20.045: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREJ [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 34Nov 21 15:13:20.045: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:20.045: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:20.045: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:20.045: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:20.045: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:21.620: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:21.620: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 5 len 15Nov 21 15:13:21.620: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:21.620: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:21.784: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 5 len 15Nov 21 15:13:21.784: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:21.784: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:23.623: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:23.623: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 6 len 15Nov 21 15:13:23.623: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:23.623: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:23.783: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 6 len 15Nov 21 15:13:23.787: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:23.787: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:24.040: Vi1 LCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 3 len 44Nov 21 15:13:24.044: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x244434C7 (0x0506244434C7)Nov 21 15:13:24.044: Vi1 LCP: PFC (0x0702)Nov 21 15:13:24.044: Vi1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802)Nov 21 15:13:24.044: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:24.044: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:24.044: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:24.044: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:24.048: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:24.048: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREJ [ACKrcvd] id 3 len 34Nov 21 15:13:24.048: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:24.048: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:24.048: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:24.048: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:24.048: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:25.627: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:25.627: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 7 len 15Nov 21 15:13:25.627: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:25.627: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:25.787: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 7 len 15Nov 21 15:13:25.787: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:25.787: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:27.630: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:27.630: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 8 len 15Nov 21 15:13:27.630: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:27.630: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:27.774: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 8 len 15Nov 21 15:13:27.774: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:27.774: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:28.046: Vi1 LCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 4 len 44Nov 21 15:13:28.046: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x244434C7 (0x0506244434C7)Nov 21 15:13:28.046: Vi1 LCP: PFC (0x0702)Nov 21 15:13:28.046: Vi1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802)Nov 21 15:13:28.046: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:28.046: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:28.046: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:28.050: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:28.050: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:28.050: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREJ [ACKrcvd] id 4 len 34Nov 21 15:13:28.050: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:28.050: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:28.050: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:28.050: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:28.054: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:29.629: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:29.629: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 9 len 15Nov 21 15:13:29.629: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:29.629: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:29.789: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 9 len 15Nov 21 15:13:29.789: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:29.789: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:31.632: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:31.632: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 10 len 15Nov 21 15:13:31.632: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:31.632: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:31.777: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 10 len 15Nov 21 15:13:31.777: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:31.777: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:32.049: Vi1 LCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 5 len 44Nov 21 15:13:32.049: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x244434C7 (0x0506244434C7)Nov 21 15:13:32.049: Vi1 LCP: PFC (0x0702)Nov 21 15:13:32.049: Vi1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802)Nov 21 15:13:32.049: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:32.053: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:32.053: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:32.053: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:32.053: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:32.053: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREJ [ACKrcvd] id 5 len 34Nov 21 15:13:32.053: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:32.053: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:32.057: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:32.057: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:32.057: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:33.636: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:33.636: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 11 len 15Nov 21 15:13:33.636: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:33.636: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:33.792: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 11 len 15Nov 21 15:13:33.792: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:33.792: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:35.635: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:35.635: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 12 len 15Nov 21 15:13:35.635: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:35.635: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:35.795: Vi1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 12 len 15Nov 21 15:13:35.795: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305)Nov 21 15:13:35.795: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0xD0678E9C (0x0506D0678E9C)Nov 21 15:13:36.052: Vi1 LCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 6 len 44Nov 21 15:13:36.052: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x244434C7 (0x0506244434C7)Nov 21 15:13:36.052: Vi1 LCP: PFC (0x0702)Nov 21 15:13:36.052: Vi1 LCP: ACFC (0x0802)Nov 21 15:13:36.052: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:36.052: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:36.052: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:36.056: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:36.056: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)COMMENT: WINDOWS 2000 VPN CLIENT INSIST IN PPP LCP NEGOTIATIONS TO REQUEST, WHAT I ASSUME IS CALLBACK: THE PARAMETERE CALLBACK 6 IN THE ABOVE I CONFREG AT TIME 15:13:36.052. THE PPP NEGOTIATION AND HENCE THE LT2P TUNNEL ESTABLISHMENT FAIL.Nov 21 15:13:36.056: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREJ [ACKrcvd] id 6 len 34Nov 21 15:13:36.056: Vi1 LCP: Callback 6 (0x0D0306)Nov 21 15:13:36.056: Vi1 LCP: MRRU 1614 (0x1104064E)Nov 21 15:13:36.056: Vi1 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 LocalNov 21 15:13:36.056: Vi1 LCP: (0x1317016C8ED3EA479945E18BB3F7251A)Nov 21 15:13:36.060: Vi1 LCP: (0xB9197000000004)Nov 21 15:13:37.638: Vi1 LCP: TIMEout: State ACKrcvdNov 21 15:13:37.638: Vi1 VPDN: ResetNov 21 15:13:37.638: Vi1 Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: O CDN to IT00639 4/1Nov 21 15:13:37.638: Vi1 Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: Session state change from established to shutting-downNov 21 15:13:37.642: Vi1 Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: VPDN: Releasing idb for LAC/LNS tunnel 1/4 session 1 state shutting-downNov 21 15:13:37.642: Vi1 VPDN: ResetNov 21 15:13:37.642: Vi1 VPDN: Unbind interfaceNov 21 15:13:37.646: Vi1 LCP: State is ListenNov 21 15:13:37.646: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to downNov 21 15:13:37.650: Vi1 LCP: State is ClosedNov 21 15:13:37.650: Vi1 PPP: Phase is DOWNNov 21 15:13:37.650: Vi1 VPDN: ResetNov 21 15:13:37.650: Vi1 VPDN: Unbind interfaceNov 21 15:13:37.851: Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: Destroying sessionNov 21 15:13:37.851: Tnl/Cl 1/1 L2TP: Session state change from shutting-down to idleNov 21 15:13:37.851: Tnl 1 L2TP: Tunnel state change from established to no-sessions-leftNov 21 15:13:37.851: Tnl 1 L2TP: No more sessions in tunnel, shutdown (likely) in 10 seconds
    View more
12-02-2000
Cancel Post

  • Unity MCI Integration w/ NEC 2000ivs2 - ( 11-22-2000 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • Using the Standard NEC SERIAL INTEGRATION (2400, 2000, 2000ivs2)on a Unity 2.4 when an internal station calls another internal station and it forwards all or BNA to voicemail the calling party gets AUTO LOGON instead of the called parties greeting. Is there a setting that makes this happen like on the NEC AD-40 version of Repartee?<br><br>
    View more
11-22-2000
Cancel Post

  • Tools note... - ( 11-16-2000 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • I've had a couple folks emial me having problems running the Bulk Edit utility, the Call Handler export, and some of the scripts off my web page...<br><br>You need to be logged in as the account that installed Unity to run some of these apps and scripts. I use the logged on account to gain access to the DOH (Unity directory wrapper). It's not a rights issue, you need to be logged in as THAT account (the one associated with our services in the service control manager). Safety first... I don't want just anyone being able to run most of these types of things.<br><br>Sorry... my bad. I should have noted that in the help and I didn't. I'm working on updating my page this weekend and in addition to updated tools (and adding a very cool new "Audio Text Viewer" app I think folks are going to dig) I'll make a note about this there and in the help files.<br><br>carry on.<br><br><br>Jeff Lindborg<br>Unity Product Architect<br>Active Voice<br>jlindborg@activevoice.com<br><A HREF="http://members.home.net/jlindborg" target="_new">http://members.home.net/jlindborg</A>
    View more
11-16-2000
Cancel Post

  • Exchange 2000 - ( 11-08-2000 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • I know this is a topic that has been discussed here before, but I would like a little input on my situation.<br>I have a customer that has no corporate email system. They wish to integrate Exchange 2000 over 5.5 because 2000 has superior workflow capabilities built in. This was actually a big selling point for this account.<br>Having said this, the customer also wants to integrate Unity into their network. <br>What I need to know is this: Can the all the workflow be done on the Exchange 2000 server, and everything else be done on the Unity server(home mailboxes) There are about 40 users. Will the workflow piece on Exchange 2000be able to communicate with the mailboxes on the Unity box? The way I have read things, it doesn't look promising. <br>If there is any way to make this work, please let me know. If we can't make Exchange 2000 work with Unity, one of my developers will have to create the workflow pieces for Exchange 5.5 instead of using the built-in tools.<br>Thanks.<br><br>
    View more
11-08-2000
Cancel Post

  • Exchange 2000 - ( 11-07-2000 )
  • Other Collaboration Subjects
  • I know that there have been several posts regarding Exchange 2000, but maybe I can get some more insight.<br>We want to implement Exchange 2000 for a customer because of the greatly improved workflow capabilities. This was one of the main selling point of our services. <br>Having said this, they also want to implement Unity. After reading all of the postings, it doesn't seem that this configuration will work as long as Unity runs on 5.5 <br>If we home all of the mailboxes on the Unity box(40 users) and leave only the workflow components on Exchange 2000. <br><br>But the way I see things, there can be only 1-way connector between the 2 servers. So the workflow portion that runs on Exchange 2000 won't be able to communicate with the Unity box.<br>Is there something that I am missing in this scenario? Is there any way to implement this scenario? Using Exchange 2000 just for workflow and using Unity to home all the mailboxes? Or is there another solution?<br>Any feedback is greatly appreciated.<br><br><br>
    View more
11-07-2000
Cancel Post