cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1878
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies

ASA 5525X - Multiple outside addresses PAT to one inside address

paul.carew
Level 1
Level 1

Hi

I am trying to get two external addresses to PAT to different ports on the same address in the dmz.

Object NAT is configured as follows:

object network Obj-192.168.1.20-1

nat (dmz,outside) static Obj-External-1 service tcp https https

object network Onj-192.168.1.20-2

nat (dmz,outside) static Obj-External-2 service tcp 2000 https

Obj-192.168.1.20-1 and Obj-192.168.1.20-2 contain the same host address.

The idea being that traffic destined for Obj-External-1 on port 443 will be forwarded to Obj-192.168.1.20-1 on port 443. Traffic for Obj-External-2 on port 443 will be forwarded to Obj-192.168.20-2 on port 2000.

Traffic for the first object, Obj-192.168.1.20-1, works but traffic for the second does not.

Can anyone help?

Thanks

Paul

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hi,

The test seems to go through.

As you can see it also hits the "inspect skinny" configuration. I am kinda wondering if using the "inspect skinny" configuration drops these or has anything to do with this not working? Though I cant see any drops by that inspection on my ASA atleast while testing.

If there a change to either remove the "inspect skinny" OR change the listening port to something else from the port TCP/2000?

This setup should work and just to be sure I just tested this on my own ASA with no problems.

Have you monitored what happens to the connections when they are initiated to this public IP address? (Looking at ASA logs through the ASDM or Syslog server) Can you monitor the logs and see if the TCP connection perhaps gets teardown with SYN Timeout or perhaps TCP Reset

You can also test the availability of the port TCP/2000 from the ASA directly with the following command

ping tcp 192.168.1.20 2000

- Jouni

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5

Jouni Forss
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Hi,

What does the "packet-tracer" test say about connections coming to the second exteternal IP address on the mapped port TCP/443?

Take the output of the command

packet-tracer input outside tcp 1.2.3.4 12345 443

And share it here

- Jouni

Thanks Jouni

Output below:

Phase: 1

Type: CAPTURE

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional Information:

MAC Access list

Phase: 2

Type: ACCESS-LIST

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Implicit Rule

Additional Information:

MAC Access list

Phase: 3

Type: UN-NAT

Subtype: static

Result: ALLOW

Config:

object network Obj-192.168.20-2

nat (dmz,outside) static Obj-External-2 service tcp 2000 https

Additional Information:

NAT divert to egress interface dmz

Untranslate 194.168.208.72/443 to 192.168.1.20/2000

Phase: 4

Type: ACCESS-LIST

Subtype: log

Result: ALLOW

Config:

access-group outside_access_in in interface outside

access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any object Obj-192.168.1.20-1 eq 2000

Additional Information:

Phase: 5

Type: IP-OPTIONS

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional Information:

Phase: 6

Type: INSPECT

Subtype: inspect-skinny

Result: ALLOW

Config:      

class-map inspection_default

match default-inspection-traffic

policy-map global_policy

class inspection_default

  inspect skinny 

service-policy global_policy global

Additional Information:

Phase: 7

Type: IDS

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional Information:

Phase: 8

Type: VPN

Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional Information:

Phase: 9

Type: NAT    

Subtype: rpf-check

Result: ALLOW

Config:

object network Obj-192.168.1.20-2

nat (dmz,outside) static Obj-External-2 service tcp 2000 https

Additional Information:

Phase: 10

Type: IP-OPTIONS

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional Information:

Phase: 11

Type: FLOW-CREATION

Subtype:

Result: ALLOW

Config:

Additional Information:

New flow created with id 7479639, packet dispatched to next module

Result:

input-interface: outside

input-status: up

input-line-status: up

output-interface: dmz

output-status: up

output-line-status: up

Action: allow

Hi,

The test seems to go through.

As you can see it also hits the "inspect skinny" configuration. I am kinda wondering if using the "inspect skinny" configuration drops these or has anything to do with this not working? Though I cant see any drops by that inspection on my ASA atleast while testing.

If there a change to either remove the "inspect skinny" OR change the listening port to something else from the port TCP/2000?

This setup should work and just to be sure I just tested this on my own ASA with no problems.

Have you monitored what happens to the connections when they are initiated to this public IP address? (Looking at ASA logs through the ASDM or Syslog server) Can you monitor the logs and see if the TCP connection perhaps gets teardown with SYN Timeout or perhaps TCP Reset

You can also test the availability of the port TCP/2000 from the ASA directly with the following command

ping tcp 192.168.1.20 2000

- Jouni

Hi Jouni

pings to the dms host on tcp port 2000 succeed from the ASA.

I've had a look at the monitoring and can see the following entries 30 seconds after a connection is tried.

Teardown TCP connection 7480653 for outside:217.37.109.246/56147 to dmz:192.168.1.20/2000 duration 0:00:30 bytes 0 TCP FINs

Theres some identical log entries but with "bytes 0 TCP Reset-O" at the end.

I changed the port to 3420 and now it works! I guess it was that "inspect-skinny".

Many thanks for your help

Paul

Hi,

The above log message seems to state that the TCP connection was formed but no data was transmitted. It also seems that the TCP connection was teardown normally (TCP FINs). If there is a TCP Reset for the same connection I am not sure what that is about.

Please mark the question as answered

- Jouni

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card