cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
616
Views
5
Helpful
2
Replies

NAT not required to cross ASA interfaces

lcaruso
Level 6
Level 6

Hi,

I"m looking to confirm that NAT is not needed when crossing ASA interfaces; for example, when going from an inside interface (sec 100) to a dmz interface (sec 50) and back.

Back when NAT was required to cross ASA interfaces, I know there were different setups like exemption and hiding, but I thought it was possible now to just let traffic go across the interfaces and all that is needed is ACLs. 

Don't have a test unit at the moment and need to make some changes that will work the first time. 

Thanks for your input.

2 Replies 2

That's exactly how it works. NAT is only done if there is a NAT config between two interfaces. If there are no NAT rules, then the traffic is routed without translation.

Thanks for confirming. Don't always have time to re-read the docs.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card