cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
760
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

Nat two identical services on interface Public Address

MarcoM
Level 1
Level 1

Hi all,

can i nat two internal address with same services on one public interface address?

I have an ASA 5515-X and i want to nat two services, tcp\80, on same ip public interface address:

object network Owa-Interno

host 10.0.1.4

object network Sito-Interno

host 10.0.1.8

nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) source static Owa-Interno interface service http http

nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) source static Sito-Interno interface service http http

!

object network INSIDE-LAN

nat (any,OUTSIDE) dynamic interface

Thanks in advance.

M

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

yes, that looks (nearly) fine. An improvement is to change your two HTTP and HTTPS-rules to object-NAT instead of twice-NAT:

object network Owa-Interno

  host 10.0.1.4

  nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) static interface service tcp https https

object network Sito-Interno

  host 10.0.1.8

  nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) static interface service tcp http http


-- 

Don't stop after you've improved your network! Improve the world by lending money to the working poor:
http://www.kiva.org/invitedby/karsteni

View solution in original post

4 Replies 4

No, that can't work. On the public side, both services have to be accessed by different ports. For example TCP/80 for server1 and TCP/81 for server2. Internally, both servers can run on TCP/80.

If it is important that both servers are reachable with TCP/80 and you only have one public IP, then an internal reverse-proxy could be the solution. This proxy takes all incoming HTTP-traffic and distributes the traffic to the internal servers based on the requested FQDN.

-- 
Don't stop after you've improved your network! Improve the world by lending money to the working poor:
http://www.kiva.org/invitedby/karsteni

Hi Karsten,

thanks for reply, you confirmed that can not use.

Another question, with this configuration static nat and vpn should work correctly right:

interface GigabitEthernet0/1

nameif OUTSIDE

security-level 0

ip address 217.51.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.240

object network INSIDE-LAN

subnet 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0

object network Owa-Interno

host 10.0.1.4

object network Sito-Interno

host 10.0.1.8

object network Rete_VpnAnyconnect

subnet 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0

nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) source static Owa-Interno interface service https https

nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) source static Sito-Interno interface service http http

nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) source static INSIDE-LAN INSIDE-LAN destination static Rete_VpnAnyconnect Rete_VpnAnyconnect no-proxy-arp route-lookup

!

object network INSIDE-LAN

nat (any,OUTSIDE) dynamic interface

Thanks.

M

yes, that looks (nearly) fine. An improvement is to change your two HTTP and HTTPS-rules to object-NAT instead of twice-NAT:

object network Owa-Interno

  host 10.0.1.4

  nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) static interface service tcp https https

object network Sito-Interno

  host 10.0.1.8

  nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) static interface service tcp http http


-- 

Don't stop after you've improved your network! Improve the world by lending money to the working poor:
http://www.kiva.org/invitedby/karsteni

Thanks Karsten.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card