06-30-2023 06:59 AM
Having discussions with a vendor about IE vs Catalyst IOS versions. I thought that IE switches had their own flavor of IOS?
Anybody know because there are a lot of CVEs that go back 10+ years and the IE switches where not around?
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-30-2023 11:40 AM - edited 06-30-2023 11:48 AM
"I thought that IE switches had their own flavor of IOS?"
Virtually all Cisco product lines will have their own "flavor" of IOS, IOS-XE, or IOS-XR (I never worked enough with Nexus devices to include them here, but suspect they are the same). All product lines will start their software dev by branching off some platform-independent mainline called something like "iosdev" or "xrdev". Due to factors like market positioning, targeted price point, available hardware resources (CPU, RAM, NPU, TCAM, FPGA, etc), product management may decide that not all the PI functions available to them in their s/w branch will be actually be supported by the platform (ie, devtested). These same factors can drive product management to develop platform-dependent features for their product, to successfully position it in the market place. PD development, as the name suggests, is very much linked to the hardware of the platform itself, particularly the NPU & FPGA. This leads to product lines having a subset of all PI features available in IOS/XE/XR, but that feature subset is extended with a unique collection of PD functions. Hence, virtually every product line ends up with its own flavor of images that cannot be loaded into other product lines.
In theory, all IOS/XE/XR products that share the same release number can support the same PI features and syntax, but in practice that is not always the case (as everyone with more than one Cisco product type can verify).
06-30-2023 09:00 AM
Hi @blackant
I believe so due a funny reason: They have their own Bugs!
06-30-2023 09:07 AM
Hello,
The IE Switches run IOS and IOS-XE depending on the model, just like Catalyst switches due.
however, each product family has its own 'image'. Just like Catalyst. you cannot run the C3750 image on C9300. same with IE.
the IE switches produce new SW versions along the same IOS train as catalyst. when new Catalyst IOS or IOS-XE SW is released, its released for IE Switches as well.
06-30-2023 11:40 AM - edited 06-30-2023 11:48 AM
"I thought that IE switches had their own flavor of IOS?"
Virtually all Cisco product lines will have their own "flavor" of IOS, IOS-XE, or IOS-XR (I never worked enough with Nexus devices to include them here, but suspect they are the same). All product lines will start their software dev by branching off some platform-independent mainline called something like "iosdev" or "xrdev". Due to factors like market positioning, targeted price point, available hardware resources (CPU, RAM, NPU, TCAM, FPGA, etc), product management may decide that not all the PI functions available to them in their s/w branch will be actually be supported by the platform (ie, devtested). These same factors can drive product management to develop platform-dependent features for their product, to successfully position it in the market place. PD development, as the name suggests, is very much linked to the hardware of the platform itself, particularly the NPU & FPGA. This leads to product lines having a subset of all PI features available in IOS/XE/XR, but that feature subset is extended with a unique collection of PD functions. Hence, virtually every product line ends up with its own flavor of images that cannot be loaded into other product lines.
In theory, all IOS/XE/XR products that share the same release number can support the same PI features and syntax, but in practice that is not always the case (as everyone with more than one Cisco product type can verify).
07-03-2023 04:52 AM
Thank you for confirming that IE among the rest of the Cisco lines are are independent.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide