It certainly would be useful to have these as a reference. So if we can get these that would be great. The suggestion to use the existing vCloud content as a starting point also makes a lot of sense. We could copy all the processes from vCloud into a new TAP and disable them; then as we tweak and test individual atomics against Terremark, we could enable them. I'm doubtful the vCloud atomics would work directly with Terremark without some modification, but I'm not that familiar (yet) with the Terremark API (modeled after or the same as vCloud (with modifications)?). By the way, the vCloud Director API is very much in line with the DMTF CIM for cloud (in fact, it looks like VMware heavily contributed to the model).
