cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
5280
Views
5
Helpful
6
Replies

Dial-peer and STCAPP

coconino1969
Level 1
Level 1

Hello,

I'm at a complete loss on this one, I have an analog phone on which we have been trying to use STCAPP for FAC but in order to start the STCAPP service I need to remove the destination-pattern from the dial-peer, when I do so, the dialtone gets replaced with a busy tone.

All of this is on Cisco 2821 H.323 Gateway (IOS 12.4(24)) using a VIC-4FXS/DID card, the phone number is configured in CUCM 7.1 as a route pattern with the 2821 as the gateway/routelist.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Config Details:

!
!
stcapp ccm-group 1
stcapp
!
stcapp feature access-code
call forward all 2
call forward cancel 9
!
stcapp feature speed-dial
!
!
!
stcapp call-control mode feature
!
!
!
voice rtp send-recv
!
voice service voip
fax protocol none
!
!
!
voice class codec 1
codec preference 1 g711ulaw
codec preference 2 g729r8
codec preference 3 g729br8
!
!
!
!
voice class h323 1
  h225 timeout tcp establish 3
!
!
!
!
voice-port 0/2/0
description Phone XXX-XXX-7948
station-id number XXXXXX7948
caller-id enable
!
!
!
ccm-manager config server 172.16.100.12
ccm-manager config
!
!
sccp local GigabitEthernet0/0
sccp ccm 172.16.100.12 identifier 1 version 7.0
sccp ccm 172.16.100.11 identifier 2 version 7.0
sccp ip precedence 3
sccp
!
sccp ccm group 1
associate ccm 1 priority 1
associate ccm 2 priority 2
associate profile 1 register NNKCONF
!
dspfarm profile 1 conference
codec g711ulaw
codec g711alaw
codec g729ar8
codec g729abr8
codec g729r8
codec g729br8
maximum sessions 9
associate application SCCP
!!
dial-peer voice 7948 pots
description XXX-XXX-7948
destination-pattern 7948
port 0/2/0
!

3 Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions

paolo bevilacqua
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Likely busy tone because registration is unsuccesulf, have you configure an analog emulation phone with the correct MAC on CCM ?

There are also various show stcapp comamnds to verify that.

View solution in original post