10-10-2012 12:45 AM - edited 03-16-2019 01:36 PM
Hello,
we have several Cisco routers 28xx, with IOS 12.x; every router has an E1 ISDN (30 channels), and 2 PVDM2-16. Furthermore, in every router a SIP trunk is configured.
We have noticed that, in the routers where we have this configuration:
dial-peer voice x voip
...
codec g711ulaw
...
!
we can reach 30 ISDN/SIP calls.
Instead, where we have this configuration:
voice class codec 1
codec preference 1 g711ulaw
codec preference 2 g711alaw
!
dial-peer voice x voip
...
voice-class codec 1
...
!
we can reach only 16 calls.
Is it normal? Maybe the router automatically allocates some DSPs for a possible G.711ulaw/alaw transcoding?
TIA and regards.
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-10-2012 02:00 AM
When dial peer 0 is used the codec would be G729 and VAD would also be used. G729 is a higher complexity codec that G711, that's the reason for why you only could get 16 calls.
You should always take care to avoid using dial peer 0 and remeber VAD is BAD, so disable use of any codec with a "b" in the name.
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.
10-10-2012 01:25 AM
Hi,
To say the truth PVDM2-16 not enough for make all Voice calls in your configuration i think.
"show dspfarm dsp all" will show you DSP allocation.
I've faced with same problem one time.
We had 3845 12.4T PVDM2-64......2 E1 PRI+CFB+XCODE 729*711.
I'd add second PVDM2-64 for make all features work as need.
10-10-2012 01:34 AM
I can assure you that we have had up to 30 calls in the first scenario (only g711ulaw configured), and up to 16 in the second one (both g711ulaw and g711alaw configured).
Anyone else has other ideas?
Regards.
10-10-2012 01:56 AM
Hello,
we have just solved the issue.
We have noticed that, in the routers where we had this issue, the dial-peer 0 was matched.
Then, we have configured a correct VOIP dial-peer, so that this one is matched, and the issue has disappeared: now, we can have more than 16 calls.
So, the voice class codec wasn't the cause of the issue.
But anyone could explain us why we had the issue, when the dial-peer 0 was matched, please?
Regards.
10-10-2012 02:00 AM
When dial peer 0 is used the codec would be G729 and VAD would also be used. G729 is a higher complexity codec that G711, that's the reason for why you only could get 16 calls.
You should always take care to avoid using dial peer 0 and remeber VAD is BAD, so disable use of any codec with a "b" in the name.
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.
10-10-2012 02:13 AM
Hello Roger,
thanks for your answer.
The weird thing is that the "show" commands normally used so far didn't help us to find the issue before.
In fact, here's the ouput from some previously submitted "show voice call status" and "show voice dsp voice" commands (when we had the issue):
----------
show voice call status
CallID CID ccVdb Port Slot/DSP:Ch Called # Codec MLPP Dial-peers
0x93B46 534 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.4 0/5:6 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93B92 618 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.2 0/1:1 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93B94 61E 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.6 0/1:3 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93B96 624 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.8 0/1:4 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93B99 62A 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.9 0/1:5 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BA2 648 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.7 0/5:2 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BAA 660 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.13 0/5:5 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BAE 66C 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.17 0/5:4 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BB2 678 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.10 0/1:6 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BB4 67E 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.14 0/5:7 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BB6 684 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.15 0/5:8 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BB8 68A 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.3 0/1:2 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BBC 696 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.5 0/1:8 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BC4 6AE 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.1 0/5:3 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BCA 6C0 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.12 0/1:7 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
0x93BD0 6D2 0x47EDA468 0/0/0:15.11 0/5:1 *XXXXXX g711ulaw 0/1
16 active calls found
show voice dsp voice
C5510 001 01 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 02 0 2020/2227
C5510 001 02 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 03 0 2968/4590
C5510 001 03 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 06 0 1437/1623
C5510 001 04 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 08 0 1406/1491
C5510 001 05 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 09 0 842/1315
C5510 001 06 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 10 0 2321/3201
C5510 001 07 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 12 0 2611/5474
C5510 001 08 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 05 0 3543/7789
C5510 001 09 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 001 10 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 001 11 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 001 12 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 001 13 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 001 14 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 001 15 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 001 16 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 005 01 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 11 0 6388/7482
C5510 005 02 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 07 0 849/995
C5510 005 03 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 01 0 1428/2324
C5510 005 04 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 17 0 160/168
C5510 005 05 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 13 0 432/452
C5510 005 06 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 04 0 4746/6507
C5510 005 07 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 14 0 4014/4672
C5510 005 08 g711ulaw 24.3.5 busy idle 0 0 0/0/0:15 15 0 10870/11911
C5510 005 09 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 005 10 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 005 11 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 005 12 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 005 13 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 005 14 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 005 15 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
C5510 005 16 None 24.3.5 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0
----------
So, we thought that everything was OK (apart the fact that we had only 16 calls).
Could you help us to explain that, too?
Thanks and regards.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: