Hello all.
I have an SBC (ace20) deployed in unified model.
I have a costumer with 2 Call managers. This costumer is behind NAT and one call manager has an IP address of 10.245.3.1 and the othet one is 10.245.3.2; I tried the following config to acheive redundancy (the ideia is to config routing in order to always choose A and if routing fails then choose B, with all costumer network behind 10.245.3.0/28):
adjacency sip A
nat force-on
signalling-address ipv4 10.245.2.1
signalling-port 5060
remote-address ipv4 10.245.3.0 255.255.255.240
signalling-peer 10.245.3.1
signalling-peer-port 5060
media-bypass-forbid
adjacency sip B
nat force-on
signalling-address ipv4 10.245.2.1
signalling-port 5060
remote-address ipv4 10.245.3.0 255.255.255.240
signalling-peer 10.245.3.2
signalling-peer-port 5060
media-bypass-forbid
The thing is that SBC doesn´t allow adjacency " an attempt was made to configure an adjacency that has the same local and remote addresses as an existing adjacency".
Why can´t this be done? I believe that the remote-address command is used to specified the ip addresses for the phones allowed to communicate with SBC, so it should work just fine.
Can anyone give a hand on this?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Joao Ribau.
