01-20-2012 05:44 AM - edited 03-16-2019 09:07 AM
Hello guys,
I have a problem to one of my customer.
Recently we have extend the number range and since this date we have trouble with inbound calls.
Called number is only specified in "To" field and not in "URI" field, "URI" field contains the general number used to authenticate on the trunk.
This makes all calls routed to general number.
what we received:
Received:
INVITE sip:222620920@217.xxx.xxx.114:5060 SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:85.xxx.xxx.1;lr=on;ftag=as08e0eb54>
IP-src:85.xxx.xxx.16
PORT-src:5060
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 85.xxx.xxx.1;branch=z9hG4bK50ef.f063de33.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 85.xxx.xxx.16:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5f0bda0f;rport=5060
From: "Wywolanie" <sip:0032495243137@85.xxx.xxx.16>;tag=as08e0eb54
To: <sip:222620213@85.xxx.xxx.1>
038753: Jan 19 11:12:41: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:
INVITE sip:222620920@217.xxx.xxx.114:5060 SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:85.xxx.xxx.1;lr=on;ftag=as23ac57c4>
IP-src:85.xxx.xxx.16
PORT-src:5060
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 85.xxx.xxx.1;branch=z9hG4bKabbb.1eeffe5.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 85.xxx.xxx.16:5060;branch=z9hG4bK369f97dd;rport=5060
From: "Wywolanie" <sip:0032495243137@85.xxx.xxx.16>;tag=as23ac57c4
To: <sip:222620921@85.xxx.xxx.1>
Do you this kind of rules can work or not ?
Thanks for your help
Hervé Jacquemin
01-20-2012 08:26 PM
Hi,
what I knew, the systems are using address in URI to route the calls, in your case:
INVITE sip:222620920@217.xxx.xxx.114:5060 SIP/2.0
I think something in Telco side. did you ask them?
Do you have the same problems with the numbers before expansions?
01-23-2012 12:38 AM
hi,
It's what we supposed but the provider said "we change nothing"...
but the problem appeared first time after the range expansion.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide