cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2845
Views
50
Helpful
27
Replies

Translation outgoing not work

akram.root
Level 4
Level 4

Hello all,

 

I have a configured a CUCM with Two gateway ISR 4321 with mode H.323.

I have on each Gateway ISR4321 one BRI (line not grouped), i configured the two gateway are fine , on the incoming call work fine each line have their extention , but on the outgoing translation the call start work  just by the BRI on the gateway 1.

 

How can i make outgoing  call translation  by each gateway .

 

Best regards

Akram 

27 Replies 27

Hi ,

what does make you think that the call from the DN 999 would use GW2?

Because the second BRI use line : 0537635777.

 

I have question , can i use two lines BRI , each one in their gateway . 

ISR1 with BRI1 (0537635766)

ISR2  with BRI2  (0537635777)

 

The two ISR are added on RG on top down . After associated it on RL.

For example ip phone 555 outgoing call by BRI1.

And ip phone 999 outgoing call by BRI2.

Is that possible in this scenario ? 

Best regards 


 

Just “Because the second BRI use line : 0537635777” it doesn’t by magic use that for egress calls when you call from the DN (999) that belongs to this BRI. You have to create the needed configuration for this in CUCM.



Response Signature


Thank you for your reply. 

Is that possible to make a outgoing call by BRI2 on gateway 2 . With gateway grrouped on RL top down . Or when the gateway 1 not function in that way i can use BR2 on gateway 2 ?

Best regards 

What you ask is absolutely possible. I previously described the configuration you need and what you have is not it. You have to create configuration in CUCM to send calls out the appropriate BRI circuit based on the DN that makes the call. Create something like this.

  • Create RG1 that has GW1 as first and GW2 as second option.
  • Create RG2 that has GW2 as first and GW1 as second option.
  • Phone1 -> put in DP1, on it set RG1 as SLRG on the DP.
  • Phone2 -> put in DP2, on it set RG2 as SLRG on the DP.
  • Create a RP for calls to PSTN that uses SLRL as the RL.

There are other options for how achieve this, but this would be the way to use the most up to date style of configuration. For additional details on how this works have a look at this post, https://www.uccollabing.com/configuring-standard-local-route-group-cucm/



Response Signature


I updated my reply from yesterday with more detailed information on what you’d need. Please have a look at it.



Response Signature


Thank you for your rich informations and your help.

 

Did you tried this on gateway 1 ?

 



Response Signature


Hi yes i tried it .

 

 

 

Whats the update after trying the configuration.

 

 

 

 



Response Signature


BalajiSivaraj49175
Spotlight
Spotlight

Calling 999 number from debug Snip'

//197/8034971B1B00/CCAPI/ccIFCallSetupRequestPrivate:
Interface=0x7F81BED0D5A8, Interface Type=6, Destination=, Mode=0x0,
Call Params(Calling Number=999,(Calling Name=)(TON=Unknown, NPI=Unknown, Screening=User, Passed, Presentation=Allowed),
Called Number=0638884592(TON=Unknown, NPI=Unknown), Calling Translated=FALSE,
Subscriber Type Str=Unknown, FinalDestinationFlag=TRUE, Outgoing Dial-peer=5, Call Count On=FALSE,
Source Trkgrp Route Label=, Target Trkgrp Route Label=, tg_label_flag=0, Application Call Id=)
Dec 23 11:29:26.230: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/CCAPI/cc_get_feature_vsa:

If you look in more detail in the debug you’ll see that the calling number is translated in the GW.

Before translation

Dec 23 11:29:26.227: //-1/8034971B1B00/CCAPI/cc_api_display_ie_subfields:
   cc_api_call_setup_ind_common:
   cisco-username=
   ----- ccCallInfo IE subfields -----
   cisco-ani=999
   cisco-anitype=0
   cisco-aniplan=0
   cisco-anipi=0
   cisco-anisi=1
   dest=0638884592
   cisco-desttype=0
   cisco-destplan=0
   cisco-rdie=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
   cisco-rdn=
   cisco-rdntype=-1
   cisco-rdnplan=-1
   cisco-rdnpi=-1
   cisco-rdnsi=-1
   cisco-redirectreason=-1   fwd_final_type =0
   final_redirectNumber =
   hunt_group_timeout =0

After translation

Dec 23 11:29:26.234: //197/8034971B1B00/CCAPI/ccCallSetupRequest:
   Calling Number=0537635777(TON=Unknown, NPI=Unknown, Screening=User, Passed, Presentation=Allowed),
   Called Number=0638884592(TON=Unknown, NPI=Unknown),
   Redirect Number=, Display Info=
   Account Number=, Final Destination Flag=TRUE,
   Guid=8034971B-3831-9148-1B00-6C010AD41606, Outgoing Dial-peer=6
Dec 23 11:29:26.234: //197/8034971B1B00/CCAPI/cc_api_display_ie_subfields:
   ccCallSetupRequest:
   cisco-username=
   ----- ccCallInfo IE subfields -----
   cisco-ani=0537635777
   cisco-anitype=0
   cisco-aniplan=0
   cisco-anipi=0
   cisco-anisi=1
   dest=0638884592
   cisco-desttype=0
   cisco-destplan=0
   cisco-rdie=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
   cisco-rdn=
   cisco-rdntype=-1
   cisco-rdnplan=-1
   cisco-rdnpi=-1
   cisco-rdnsi=-1
   cisco-redirectreason=-1   fwd_final_type =0
   final_redirectNumber =
   hunt_group_timeout =0

As I wrote before, if it’s still not what is presented as the calling number on the receiving end the calling number is changed by the telco. You’d have to discuss this with them to find out if they have the option to let the calling number pass untouched. If not you'd have to do good with that you can get the correct calling number if the call egress out via the circuit where the phone number resides.



Response Signature


BalajiSivaraj49175
Spotlight
Spotlight

IS there is any translation route configured in the CUCM or Application rule configured in the CUCM

Neither of these would be of any good here.



Response Signature