MPLS

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Forum Posts

Hi, In case I am implementing MPLS TE FRR using RSVP hellos in my mpls backbone for speedy convergence against link/node failures. Do I still need to teak my IGP,BGP & LDP convergence timers or make my IGP,BGP,LDP to converge based on trigger from ...

anil12345 by Level 1
  • 529 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

Does anyone care to share a template for implementing MPLS using OSPF for the transport within the PE cloud?I can find the start of this stuff, but I am not finding where there is documented what the OSPF part looks like.Thanks.

Dear all,This is a generic question , is there any reason that router selects an ospf route with E1 type metric 40000 over another ospf route type E1 with metric 101the first route is coming from MPBGP redistribution to OSPF ( PE >>> CE) , while the ...

Hi,Our client is planning to upgrade their existing two core routers of their MPLS backbone. They are considering three core and four core design. We would like to know if there are any drawbacks of having three core design against a two core or four...

prakashj by Level 1
  • 746 Views
  • 6 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

two as, as 1 and as 2,want to connect through GE interface,GSR platform.we want to use option B, but AS 1 internet routing is running in a vpn. global routing is private address.i want to use two sub interfae on GE, one interface connect mpls vpn opt...

flyjunli by Level 1
  • 1058 Views
  • 6 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes

I am facing a issue with mVPN data mdt convergence. Scenario is given belowCE1(Sender)-PE1--P---PE2---CE2(Receiver) | PE3 | CE3 (Receiver) SP core is using SSM and customer is using auto-r...

hello,i have a gre tunnels configured on a 3845 router to remote 1811 routers. these tunnels does down sometimes and it gives this error:Jun 1 15:44:30.097: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/0, changed state to upJun 1 15:44:30.325: %LINEP...

Hi all,we are implementing Cisco WAAS (or another cache engine) and need to redirect traffic within one VRF via VRF-aware Policy based Routing (PBR). Mainly everything was configured according the config guide at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/m...

Question. Best practice is to configure iBGP via loopback interface. My question is, is that valid statement for scenario where two BGP peers are seperated by a firewall?

The router is not allowing me to add QOS service policy under Ethernet subinterfaces in a VRF-life setup on 7206.Would QOS work for all the VRF if I create multiple classes for each VRF under one main policy-map and apply to main interface?

frank by Level 1
  • 3762 Views
  • 7 replies
  • 0 Helpful votes
Top Solution Authors