cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
958
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

LDP FLAPPING CONTINUOUSLY

rawat.umed
Level 1
Level 1

Hi

We are facing issue of ldp flapping continously in our mpls network.

3: Jan  9 12:47:12 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.21:0 (0) is DOWN (Received error notification from peer: KeepAlive expired)

1046264: Jan  9 12:47:13 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 34): starting graceful recovery

1046265: Jan  9 12:47:13 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.21:0 (34) is UP

1046266: Jan  9 12:47:58 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 11): completed graceful recovery

1046267: Jan  9 12:49:13 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 34): completed graceful recovery

1046268: Jan  9 12:50:08 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 11): interrupted--recovery pending

1046269: Jan  9 12:50:08 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.27:0 (0) is DOWN (Session KeepAlive Timer expired)

1046270: Jan  9 12:50:09 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 9): starting graceful recovery

1046271: Jan  9 12:50:09 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.27:0 (9) is UP

1046272: Jan  9 12:51:23 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 34): interrupted--recovery pending

1046273: Jan  9 12:51:23 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.21:0 (0) is DOWN (Received error notification from peer: KeepAlive expired)

1046274: Jan  9 12:51:26 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 38): starting graceful recovery

1046275: Jan  9 12:51:26 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.21:0 (38) is UP

1046276: Jan  9 12:51:26 IST: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 10.134.254.2 on GigabitEthernet1/8 from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: BFD node down

1046277: Jan  9 12:51:29 IST: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 10.134.254.2 on GigabitEthernet1/8 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done

1046278: Jan  9 12:52:09 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 9): completed graceful recovery

1046279: Jan  9 12:53:26 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 38): completed graceful recovery

1046280: Jan  9 12:54:19 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 9): interrupted--recovery pending

1046281: Jan  9 12:54:19 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.27:0 (0) is DOWN (Session KeepAlive Timer expired)

1046282: Jan  9 12:54:22 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 11): starting graceful recovery

1046283: Jan  9 12:54:22 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.27:0 (11) is UP

1046284: Jan  9 12:55:36 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 38): interrupted--recovery pending

1046285: Jan  9 12:55:36 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.21:0 (0) is DOWN (Received error notification from peer: KeepAlive expired)

1046286: Jan  9 12:55:37 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 34): starting graceful recovery

1046287: Jan  9 12:55:37 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.21:0 (34) is UP

1046288: Jan  9 12:56:18 IST: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 10.134.254.2 on GigabitEthernet1/8 from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: BFD node down

1046289: Jan  9 12:56:22 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 11): completed graceful recovery

1046290: Jan  9 12:56:24 IST: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 1, Nbr 10.134.254.2 on GigabitEthernet1/8 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done

1046291: Jan  9 12:57:37 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 34): completed graceful recovery

1046292: Jan  9 12:58:32 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 11): interrupted--recovery pending

1046293: Jan  9 12:58:32 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.27:0 (0) is DOWN (Session KeepAlive Timer expired)

1046294: Jan  9 12:58:33 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 9): starting graceful recovery

1046295: Jan  9 12:58:33 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.27:0 (9) is UP

1046296: Jan  9 12:59:47 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 34): interrupted--recovery pending

1046297: Jan  9 12:59:47 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.21:0 (0) is DOWN (Received error notification from peer: KeepAlive expired)

1046298: Jan  9 12:59:47 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 38): starting graceful recovery

1046299: Jan  9 12:59:47 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.21:0 (38) is UP

1046300: Jan  9 13:00:33 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 9): completed graceful recovery

1046301: Jan  9 13:01:47 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 38): completed graceful recovery

1046302: Jan  9 13:02:43 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 9): interrupted--recovery pending

1046303: Jan  9 13:02:43 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.27:0 (0) is DOWN (Session KeepAlive Timer expired)

1046304: Jan  9 13:02:44 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.27:0 (inst. 11): starting graceful recovery

1046305: Jan  9 13:02:44 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.27:0 (11) is UP

1046306: Jan  9 13:03:57 IST: %LDP-5-GR: GR session 10.135.254.21:0 (inst. 38): interrupted--recovery pending

1046307: Jan  9 13:03:57 IST: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 10.135.254.21:0 (0) is DOWN (Received error notification from peer: KeepAlive expired)

We have checked the interfaces and no flapping were there in that.

Also when we gave the cmd

SUR_COR#sh mpls ldp nei 10.135.254.27

    Peer LDP Ident: 10.135.254.27:0; Local LDP Ident 10.135.254.2:0

        TCP connection: 10.135.254.27.37737 - 10.135.254.2.646

        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 2276/2; Downstream

        Up time: 00:00:08

        LDP discovery sources:

          Targeted Hello 10.135.254.2 -> 10.135.254.27, active, passive

no ip are there in targeted hello .

while at the other end

SUR_PE1#sh mpls ldp nei 10.135.254.2

    Peer LDP Ident: 10.135.254.2:0; Local LDP Ident 10.135.254.27:0

        TCP connection: 10.135.254.2.646 - 10.135.254.27.37737

        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 2277/2278; Downstream

        Up time: 00:02:00

        LDP discovery sources:

          Targeted Hello 10.135.254.27 -> 10.135.254.2, active, passive

        Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:

          10.135.254.2    10.135.7.233    10.135.7.249    10.135.7.229   

          10.135.7.237    10.135.7.217    10.135.7.213    10.135.7.201   

          10.135.7.6      10.135.7.225    10.135.7.197    10.134.1.26    

          10.135.7.10     10.135.7.26     10.134.1.50     10.135.7.221   

          10.135.7.193    10.135.7.245    172.18.123.145  172.18.123.221 

          10.134.1.34     10.135.7.241    10.135.7.177    10.134.1.30    

          10.135.7.205    10.135.7.209    10.135.7.14     10.135.7.17    

          10.135.7.21    

we are getting intermediate ip addresses.

Any one can help regarding this

3 Replies 3

Rivalino Tamaela
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

From show command we can see that SUR_COR receives less LDP messages, could be dropped along the path. It sent 2276 but receives only 2 packets from its neighbor.

SUR_COR#sh mpls ldp nei 10.135.254.27

    Peer LDP Ident: 10.135.254.27:0; Local LDP Ident 10.135.254.2:0

        TCP connection: 10.135.254.27.37737 - 10.135.254.2.646

        State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 2276/2; Downstream

        Up time: 00:00:08

        LDP discovery sources:

          Targeted Hello 10.135.254.2 -> 10.135.254.27, active, passive

While SUR_PE1 could send and receive LDP messages correctly. Need to investigate if there is any congestion one way from 10.135.254.2 to 10.135.254.27.

HTH,

Rivalino

Hi Rivalino

There is no congestion in the path. Actually sur_cor and sha_cor are two cores in our n/w and sur_pe1 is directly connected to  sha_cor .

What else can we check .

Looks like this is a duplicate thread. I have responded on the previous thread.