02-03-2011 04:38 AM
MP-BGP RR receives update for aggregated route from RR Client, which is PE router, installs it in routing table but doesn't send UPDATE to other clients.
Route is aggregated using
aggregate-address ADDRESS MASK summary-only
command on MPLS PE router.
Does anyone have similar problem???
Thanks in advance!
02-03-2011 08:49 AM
Hello Dusko,
you need to check using appropriate command all the attributes of the VPNv4 route
for IOS you can use
show ip bgp vpnv4 all
are there other PE nodes advertising more specific routes with same RD?
Are the route target extended communities the expected ones?
Hope to help
Giuseppe
02-03-2011 11:21 PM
Hello Giuseppe,
Thank you for your fast answer! I've checked all attributes and all seems ok, but it doesn't work. You can find bellow output for sh ip bgp vpnv4 XXXX
sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf test:999 192.168.2.0
BGP routing table entry for XXX:9991:192.168.2.0/24, version 30546
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table test:999)
Not advertised to any peer
Local, (aggregated by XXX 10.0.0.2), (Received from a RR-client), imported path from XXX:9992:192.168.2.0/24
10.0.0.2 (metric 3) from 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate, best
Extended Community: RT:XXX:999
mpls labels in/out nolabel/64
If try to check this prefix on other PE router it looks like:
sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf test:999 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
% Network not in table
I've tried with your suggested command
show ip bgp vpnv4 all
and find that there isn't any PE router which is advertising this prefix.
This is output for other subnet which is not aggregated
sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf test:999 10.3.1.0 255.255.255.0
BGP routing table entry for XXX:9991:10.3.1.0/24, version 22911
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table test:999)
Not advertised to any peer
Local, (Received from a RR-client), imported path from XXX:9993:10.3.1.0/24
10.0.0.3 (metric 2) from 10.0.0.3 (10.0.0.3)
Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
Extended Community: RT:XXX:999
mpls labels in/out nolabel/32
This prefix is regulary advertised to other clients...
Regards,
Dusko
02-06-2011 02:26 AM
Hi,
Can you please show us the output of following commands on RR:
sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
sh ip bgp vpnv4 all summary
show ip bgp vpn4 all neigh [IP] advertised-routes
02-10-2011 12:29 PM
Hi
Not really sure if this is of any relevance, but can this be CSCtc55897?
Happens to be fixed in latest SRE now.
Route reflectors not reflecting aggregate routes | |
Symptoms: R2 will not advertise the routes. Conditions: The symptom is observed under the following conditions: 1. R2 has two IBDG neighbors in the same update-group one neighbor with 4BAS and and the other with 2BAS capability. 2. The locally originated routes or routes without any AS_PATH will not be advertised to this kind of group. Workaround: Try to make the 2BAS and 4BAS neighbors fall into different update-groups by configuring dummy route-maps. |
02-11-2011 12:20 AM
Hi,
It is probably some IOS bug. I use c7600rsp72043-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SRE2.bin IOS version.
In next few days I'll try to upgrade my IOS version and I'll let you know if I can make it to work with this.
Regards,
Dusko
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide