09-08-2025 04:52 AM
Hi All,
We are working on configuring EAP Chaining for both machine and user authentication. Based on Cisco's documentation, EAP Chaining allows both the user and machine to be authenticated in a single session. I'm exploring two methods for this: EAP-FAST and TEAP, both of which support an inner method of EAP-TLS. To help me move forward, I'd like to compare these two options based on the following:
Ease of deployment
Security
Any insights or recommendations you have would be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
09-08-2025 04:57 AM
@henokk60 EAP-FAST requires Cisco NAM licenses, there is additional overhead in deploying the client software and management, there is also the cost involved to purchase the NAM licenses.
TEAP uses the windows native supplicant, so no additional cost. TEAP can be centrally managed using AD GPOs.
EAP Chaining (EAP-FAST or TEAP) both can use EAP-TLS and provide more security, by combining the user and machine authentications, this ensures a user is connecting from a corporate owned asset that has been authenticated.
09-10-2025 11:52 AM
Beyond what Rob mentioned, if you are using the windows native supplicant for TEAP you must use EAP-TLS with user and machine certificates unless you disable credential guard in Win 11. This is a limiting factor for some environments, you can disable credential guard but it is a recommended security feature.
If you have the means to use certificate based auth it seems to work extremely well from a security and end user standpoint.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide