04-17-2018 06:42 AM
Hi all,
I am working on an important POV but we are facing one issues with Extreme Networks switches which is the following :
This is how the NAD is configured :
We tried different devices, the session of those sessions are terminated in the Live Logs.
The endpoint use NAM and has been tested working fine on other switches with 802.1X
Attached the config on the switch.
We need to close this POV on Friday and this is an important part of it, your inputs are more than welcome
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-17-2018 08:34 AM
The issue is typically in NAD Profile under the Host Lookup settings. One EXOS reference indicates that PAP is required protocol. Another item to investigate is Policy > Policy Elements > Results > Authentication > Allowed Protocols and the use of Message Authenticator (at bottom).
Another issue is that current flow matches are not distinct enough to separate 802.1X from MAB flow. In your screenshot above, the username was anonymous but Calling ID is MAC. Need to make sure matching MAB flow.
04-17-2018 06:59 AM
Are you able to see what the RADIUS service-type is? I'm wondering if it is not matching because of the service-type value sent from the switch to ISE.
Regards,
-Tim
04-17-2018 07:05 AM
Hi Tim,
The service-type is Login. This is what is configured in the NAD and also what we receive from the RADIUS request (see screenshot)
Remi
04-17-2018 08:34 AM
The issue is typically in NAD Profile under the Host Lookup settings. One EXOS reference indicates that PAP is required protocol. Another item to investigate is Policy > Policy Elements > Results > Authentication > Allowed Protocols and the use of Message Authenticator (at bottom).
Another issue is that current flow matches are not distinct enough to separate 802.1X from MAB flow. In your screenshot above, the username was anonymous but Calling ID is MAC. Need to make sure matching MAB flow.
04-17-2018 11:39 AM
Thanks Craig. This is how the NAD is configured with PAP activated.
I'll try tomorrow to activate Message Authenticator.
For the flow, yes for MAB it is not matching. Not sure so far how can I distinguish them.
For 802.1X it should match however but still getting this error.
04-17-2018 12:05 PM
For starters, my mistake since I assumed you were trying MAC auth first but realize you mention NAM and that would explain the username of anonymous as outer identity.
For MAB use case:
For 1X use case:
Craig
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide