04-01-2014 05:42 AM
Is this by purpose or by mistake, but after updating latest device pack to CPI 2.0 all routers started report Partial Collection Failure.
Once I looked into message (stating that collection of OSPF information is missing - which is correct as I don't use OSPF) and then to inventory.log - which confirmed this:
[2014-04-01 15:20:29,235] [ICE Service[ 1]Thread: 7] [inventory] [ERROR] - A.B.C.D For device id: 3076073 Feature = feature_ospf and Procedure = procedure failed in time 0 with the following error and continuing with other features: com.cisco.nm.expression.function.FunctionException: Expression has not compiled sucessfully
[2014-04-01 15:20:29,235] [ICE Service[ 1]Thread: 7] [ice] [ERROR] - com.cisco.nm.expression.function.FunctionException: Expression has not compiled sucessfully
com.cisco.nm.expression.function.FunctionException: Expression has not compiled sucessfully
at com.cisco.nm.expression.compiler.ErroredCompiledExpression.run(ErroredCompiledExpression.java:17)
at com.cisco.nm.expression.ExpressionRunner.eval(ExpressionRunner.java:30)
at com.cisco.nm.workflow.run.WorkflowExpressionRunner.eval(WorkflowExpressionRunner.java:39)
at com.cisco.nm.workflow.steps.DeclareStep.run(DeclareStep.java:70)
at com.cisco.nm.workflow.run.FlowStepContainerRunner.runSteps(FlowStepContainerRunner.java:115)
at com.cisco.nm.workflow.run.FlowStepContainerRunner.runFlowNoConsoleEvents(FlowStepContainerRunner.java:65)
at com.cisco.nm.workflow.run.WorkflowRunner.run(WorkflowRunner.java:45)
at com.cisco.nm.workflow.function.workflow.WorkflowFunction.call(WorkflowFunction.java:47)
at com.cisco.nm.runner.PackageRepositoryRunnerRequest.run(PackageRepositoryRunnerRequest.java:113)
at com.cisco.nm.run.ThreadRunnerRequestRunnable.run(ThreadRunnerRequestRunnable.java:17)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
at com.cisco.nm.run.ThreadPool$PooledThread.run(ThreadPool.java:60)
Why lacking of OSPF information in router can be this fatal???
Is there new ruleset associated to all routers in this device pack (pi_device_pack_4_update_2.0-30.ubf), which is not clearly mentioned in README file?? This is more or less frustrating situation - one problem got fixed and new introduced...
/Mikko
04-06-2014 07:04 PM
I have a similar issue, both my VG224 and C3925 ISR are showing the same Paritial Collection Failure due to OSPF missing...which is not configured on those boxes.
Mikko, have you logged a Cisco TAC Case for this?
Regards,
Greg.
04-06-2014 10:26 PM
Nope, decided to skip this CPI 2.0 and stick with LMS 4.2 until CPI having feature parity with LMS comes available.
/Mikko
04-06-2014 10:52 PM
Fair enough. I have to use CPI 2.0 for a deployment so I guess I'll be logging another case.
05-12-2014 09:48 PM
FYI, after an upgrade to PI v2.1 this issue has been resolved.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide