01-15-2019 08:15 PM - edited 03-12-2019 07:13 AM
Hi All,
Can we apply 2 different Qos rules for the same flow. One on the ingress interface and other on the egress interface.
I need to limit one drive traffic to X mbps and out of that each user should be limited to Y mbps.
01-16-2019 12:35 AM
Each interface has two levels of queuing available. One is a hardware queue (called tx-ring) which is serviced by FIFO (First In First Out) method. Second is a software queue which is configurable (default serviced by FIFO as well). As Voice and business critical application’s traffic is more important than other corporate traffic (like Web traffic) it is recommended to make use from software queue and prioritize some traffic over the other. Prioritize in software queue will allow important traffic to go sooner to the hardware queue than non-important traffic. This is most useful for latency-dependant traffic like Voice or Video. Voice traffic is usually marked by EF (Expedited Forwarding) bit in the Layer 3 header. We can use this information to match the traffic and prioritize it. We can also use an ACL to mark the traffic.
It is important to enable priority queuing on the respective interface before configuring action for class map. Finally, our policy map must be attached globally or on the interface. Attaching it globally has effect on every interface where priority queuing is enabled.
Also note that priority queuing is an outbound only solution. We cannot prioritize inbound traffic.
01-16-2019 12:40 AM
This needs to be done on an FTD
01-16-2019 06:23 AM
01-16-2019 06:30 AM
just a thought as major of the function are inherit from ASA to FTD so it could be a limitation in FTD too. unless cisco engineer want to try and let us know what is the out come of this.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide