cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1099
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

K-value mismatch with EIGRP on ASA5540

jkeeffe
Level 2
Level 2

I have an ASA- 5585X (v.8.2.4) directly connected to an upstream 6509, which is running EIGRP. I configured the ASA for EIGRP with same AS# and network numbers and no auto-summary.   Here are the log messages I got:

Mar  8 15:11:08: %PIM-5-NBRCHG: neighbor 164.72.178.28 UP on interface Vlan150 (vrf default)
Mar  8 15:11:08: %PIM-5-DRCHG: DR change from neighbor 0.0.0.0 to 164.72.178.28 on interface Vlan150 (vrf default)

Mar  8 15:11:11: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 1: Neighbor 164.72.178.28 (Vlan150) isup: new adjacency
Mar  8 16:16:08: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 1: Neighbor 164.72.178.25 (Vlan150) isup: new adjacency

Mar  8 16:18:54: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 1: Neighbor 164.72.178.25 (Vlan150) is down: K-value mismatch

I lost my SSH connection to the upstream 6509 and couldn't get it back. Luckily I didn't lose my ASDM connection to the ASA, so I disabled EIGRP and went to look at the logs on the 6509.

What causes a K-value mismatch, and how to I rectify the situation?

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hi,

I would suggest to review the EIGRP configuration on both sides to make sure we have matching parameters to establish the adjacency.

Please refer to this thread:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/152135

Federico.

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

Hi,

I would suggest to review the EIGRP configuration on both sides to make sure we have matching parameters to establish the adjacency.

Please refer to this thread:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/152135

Federico.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card