ā04-18-2016 01:50 AM - edited ā03-12-2019 12:37 AM
Hi All,
I have problems with cisco ASA using 8.3(1) Software Version, the symptoms indicates to this bug CSCsg09419 but with different version of OS. below is output from show asp drop command :
7: 10:44:13.240176 x.x.x.x.4427 > 1x.x.x.x.449: S 3127442769:3127442769(0) win 65535 <mss 1380,nop,nop,sackOK> Drop-reason: (tcp-fo-drop) TCP replicated flow pak drop
53: 10:44:40.383921 x.x.x.x.4517 > x.x.x.x.449: S 4030465714:4030465714(0) win 65535 <mss 1380,nop,nop,sackOK>
71: 10:44:46.315901 x.x.x.x.4517 > x.x.x.x.449: S 4030465714:4030465714(0) win 65535 <mss 1380,nop,nop,sackOK>
194: 10:45:37.507938 x.x.x.x.22570 > x.x.x.x.449: S 4274859623:4274859623(0) win 64240 <mss 1380,nop,nop,sackOK>
any suggestion about this problems?
i need help soon as possible...thanks.
Best Regards,
Fahmi
Solved! Go to Solution.
ā04-21-2016 10:28 AM
If this is related to the bug then an upgrade is the only solution.
drop explanation from Cisco doc http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa82/command/reference/cmd_ref/s2.html
Name: tcp-fo-drop
TCP replicated flow pak drop:
This counter is incremented and the packet is dropped when appliance receives a TCP packet with control flag like SYN, FIN or RST on an established connection just after the appliance has taken over as active unit.
Recommendations:
None
Syslogs:
None
--
Please remember to select a correct answer and rate helpful posts
ā04-21-2016 02:19 AM
8.3(1) is getting pretty old. Are you able to upgrade?
ā04-21-2016 10:28 AM
If this is related to the bug then an upgrade is the only solution.
drop explanation from Cisco doc http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa82/command/reference/cmd_ref/s2.html
Name: tcp-fo-drop
TCP replicated flow pak drop:
This counter is incremented and the packet is dropped when appliance receives a TCP packet with control flag like SYN, FIN or RST on an established connection just after the appliance has taken over as active unit.
Recommendations:
None
Syslogs:
None
--
Please remember to select a correct answer and rate helpful posts
ā05-03-2016 10:26 PM
Hi marius,
The issue is resolved by clearing the connections.
found that the timeout is 00:00:00 which is unreasonable value so we changed it to the recommended (1:00:00)
also we've plan to upgrade the software...
Thank you for your response.
rgds
NFH
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide