cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
341
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Regarding Xlate info in ASA

venkatappan
Level 1
Level 1

generally , in one static 1 to 1 NAT the output of show xlate shows as below right .

ham-vpn-fw/ham-vpn-fw# sh xlate | in 172.20.164.139 

NAT from outside:10.90.0.18 to cbtsmgmt:172.20.164.139 

ham-vpn-fw/ham-vpn-fw#

but in one  of my case showing as belwo:

ham-vpn-fw/ham-vpn-fw-of2# sh xlate | in 172.22.201.6
    10.27.18.56, 10.57.14.129, 10.27.14.18 to cbtsmgmt:172.22.201.1, 172.22.201.2, 172.22.201.3, 172.22.201.4, 172.22.201.5, 172.22.201.6
    10.27.17.4 to cbtsmgmt:172.22.201.65, 172.22.201.66,
    172.22.201.67, 172.22.201.68
ham-vpn-fw/ham-vpn-fw-of2#

What is difference between of them ?

1 Reply 1

Ben Weber
Level 1
Level 1

The NAT configuration on ham-vpn-fw-of2 appears to have been done using a range of network objects.

The first set of external IPs are non-contiguous and map to a higher number of internal IPs than external IPs. If you do not configure this, it would be worth understanding the reasoning behind this design as it is not immediately obvious from the snippet.

The second NAT translation on ham-vpn-fw-of2 is a one-to-many static NAT configuration.

If there are no particular design requirements forcing either of these NAT configurations, it would be highly recommended to transition to dynamic NAT overload (aka PAT) as it is much easier to maintain for generic use cases.

- BW
Please rate posts if they have been helpful.
Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card