We know that the Type-1 LSA describes the link type connected to the router, the neighbor router and the subnet number.
In this topology, assume we dont have a Type-2 LSA, so each router will create its own Type-1 LSA, the Type-1 LSA will describe the neighboring router and the subnet connected to.
Each router will create its own Type-1 LSA with 5 links, inside each Type-1 LSA 4 Link Type 1 to describe who is connected to me, and 1 Link Type 3 to describe the subnet number shared with the neighboring router, in this case all routers share the same subnet number 10.1.1.0/24.
Each router will list 4 neighboring routers. Now imagine we have 100 routers for example, each routers will have 99 Link Type 1 in the Body of its own Type-1 LSA.
The first issue is that each Router creates a big Type-1 LSA with a lot Links Type 1, the flooding of these big LSAs Type-1 between the routers will cause a chaotic situation for the network.
The second issue is that the Link Type 3 (which describes the subnet number) is repeated uselessly.
Let s imagine a router in the same area but not attached to the multiaccess segment, then imagine we have 50 routers in this segment. If each attached router will carry the shared subnet. The router which is not attached to the segment will receive 50 LSA Type-1 , inside each LSA the same shared subnet 10.1.1.0/24. This is not efficient. One router is enough to inform it about this subnet instead of 50 routers. This is why the information of this special subnet was moved to the DR. No imagine the same drother is connected to multiple segments. Let's say 50 segments in the same area. Therefore it will generate a single Type-1 LSA with 50 links in the body of this LSA increasing the size of the Type-1 LSA with the risk to go beyond the MTU value 1500 and causing ip fragmentation, from the design 's perspective this is not desirable.
The creators of OSPF optimized ospf behavior on multiaccess by:
-first introducing the concept of DR
-second introducing the Network LSA.
After that to optimize LSA flooding. The DR has the responsability to carry two informations:
-the attached routers so the drother routers will discover them
-the shared subnet of the multiaccess.
So that other routers NOT ATTACHED to this subnet will learn this subnet through LSA Type-2 instead of the LSA Type 1 of each attached routers.
Representation of OSPF Multiaccess Without the concept of DR and Network LSA
Representation of OSPF Multiaccess With the concept of DR and Network LSA
Dear all, I have a simple configuration on PacketTracer 6.0.1 (an old version indeed) where I was playing with HSRP priorities but it does not seem to be working as expected. I have 3 routers configured with IP addresses R1= 192.168.1.1, R2 = 19...
I have been handed an ASR 901 10G from a new building takeover. Left in an IT closet.Not sure if I want to play with it or not. What do they do?How much will it cost to license any services on it? Can I reset it? (not clear how based on se...
Hello, PC is connected to a router, loopback is created and able to reach without any issues from PC but from the other router which is connected to same router it's not pinging. I know we need to configure routing protocol, default routing etc ...
hi all, I am trying to ping R10 to R9 connection dropping.i am using here VPNv4 Please help me Thanks// R1Edge_R1_AS_100#sho runBuilding configuration...Current configuration : 2485 bytes!version 15.4service timestamps debug date...
Dear Cisco support, Please help us to find out the solution of our problem. Port 2 on C9300-NM-4G is not working/detected with our SFP transceiver GLC-LH-SMD, although the 1,3,4 Port is running well. When we type "sh logs" we found that when we plug ...