Configuring QOS can be an extremely complex task depending on how granular the user wants to control both in policy as well as out of policy traffic. Meaning, is bandwidth guaranteed and if so how is excess bandwidth handled. Many software forwarding platforms today use a two (2) parameter scheduler that include "maximum" and "excess".
The ASR1000 series implements a more advanced three (3) parameter scheduler.
The three parameters are:
Min = bandwidth command Max = shape command Excess_weight = bandwidth remaining command
Usually available bandwidth above the guaranteed amount is referred to simply as excess but giving the description "excess_weight" may make it easier to explain as in the example below.
This becomes important because the same configuration on say a 7200VXR series platform may not result in the same traffic handling policy on an ASR1000 series device.
Let's explain the calculation a little for the ASR1000 implementation. We service the "Min" guarantees first so class1 gets 10% based on the "bandwidth" command since the "bandwidth" command sets the Min. Similarly, class2 gets 20% which leaves 70% of the overall bandwidth available to be used and is not guaranteed anywhere. Meaning we have 70% in the "excess pool".
This excess is shared among classes that are looking for bandwidth based on their "Excess_weight". In the implementation today each class gets an equal share of the excess which is how the respective throughput values are derived.
Total load: 100% class1: min = 10 class2: min = 20
Excess is 70% so with two classes that's 35% of the excess to each class. Therefore class1 would get 45% (10 min + 35% excess) and class2 would get 55% (20 min + 35% excess).
Let's take the above and apply it to a network scenario with real values.
Assume we would like to have a subrate gigabit ethernet link running at 200 Mbps and guarantee the following
class "voice" is guaranteed 10 Mbps of low latency traffic and is policed above that rate class "data1" is guaranteed 10 Mbps class "data2" is guaranteed 10 Mbps class "data3" is guaranteed 80 Mbps class "default" is guaranteed 10 Mbps
Here is the policy-map configuration
shape average 200000000
The result of this configuration would be the following throughput for each class if each class was sending at 200 Mbps. We use the 200 Mbps sending for each class to represent how all the excess would be used if there was only data for a single class at any given time.
Under the full load for all classes the result would be:
class voice => gets 10 Mbps and is strictly policed above 10 Mbps with or without congestion class data1 => gets 30 Mbps class data2 => gets 30 Mbps class data3 => gets 100 Mbps class default => gets 30 Mbps
That gives a total of 190 Mbps allocated to the bandwidth classes and 10 Mbps for the priority for a total of the 200 Mbps which the parenter shaper allows.
The bandwidth received for each class was calculated based on an equal excess weight for each class and a excess bandwidth of 80 Mbps (200 total - 10 priority - 110 Min). That means each bandwidth (non priority) class would get 20 Mbps of the excess.
In the future the allocation of excess bandwidth will be configurable similar to something like this versus all classes getting an equal weight of excess bandwidth:
My device is not being recognized by #show power inline police. Here are some logging information that may be helpful. I would like to be able to control POE on this port. With device plugged in...#show power inline police gigabitEthernet 1/0/15Inter...
NAT sometimes is the bane of my existence. I'm trying to setup a vti site-to-site vpn with cisco routers. The VPN connection comes up fine. My problem is that i'm using the same interface for internet access as well. my endpoints can reach the intern...
Hi good day, I have a problem with SW WS-C4503-E, send these messages in the logs;% C4K_EBM-4-HOSTFLAPPING: Host 55: 32: D1: 00: K8: X8 in vlan 100 is moving from port Gi1 / 1 to port Po1It is a constant message, I verify it in the documentation and ...
Hello all, I have 2 stacked switches and I have updated the IOS to CAT3K_CAA-UNIVERSALK9 Version 16.3.8I there a SVI for the vlan where the clients are connected. I have set ip helper-address "DHCP IP" in this SVI, before the update it was ...
To participate in this event, please use the button to ask your questions
This topic is a chance to discuss more about how you can utilize the Cisco SD-WAN Cloud onRamp for CoLocation solution to c...