Redundancy for multicast traffic requires these two things:
A unicast routing protocol, for example, Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) or Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP)
Configuration of Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) on all related layer 3 (L3) interfaces
PIM uses Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) checks the unicast routing table to determine the proper paths for multicast data to traverse. If a unicast routing path changes, PIM relies upon the unicast routing protocol (OSPF) to properly converge. This helps the RPF checks of the PIM to show valid unicast paths to and from the IP address of the server that sources the multicast stream.
The unicast routing table is used to select paths for PIM. PIM uses RPF checks to ultimately determine the Shortest Path Tree (SPT) between the client (receiver VLAN) and the multicast source VLAN. So, the goal of PIM is the shortest unicast path between the receiver subnet and source subnet. As long as unicast routing protocol works as expected, and PIM is configured on all L3 links associated with the unicast routing protocol, nothing special needs to be configured for multicast to properly fail over.
For more detailed information on Multicast Traffic, refer to this document:
We'd like to learn a little about your network, your pain points with monitoring an enterprise network, and your preferred solution and workflow to solve issues.
We ask that you complete our brief survey: https://ciscoux.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV...
Good day !I'm in the process of building a common configuration that I'm using to bootstrap multiple xrv 9k instances. The configuration comprises groups that are then applied in the relevant section. While I have verified that the groups are defined on s...
The first error we get is an error message that states: "SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL - Memory allocation of 962820 bytes failed from 0x8000561D10652750, alignment 8 Pool: Processor Free: 71887584 Cause: Memory fragmentation Alternate Pool: None Free: 0 Cause: N...
How to check Nexus 9K switches can be managed with Dnac current version 22.214.171.124 or not. Is there any possibility of checking compatibility with our existing version ? We want to deploy Nexus switches in DNAC tool with version 126.96.36.199, So please sugge...
Have you ever wondered why pluggable optics exist? Have you ever wondered what acronyms like QSFP, LR4, FEC, and PAM4 actually mean? In this episode I continue my conversation with my colleague Ray Nering. He explains to me how a lot of these came to be, ...