10-07-2011 12:47 PM - edited 03-01-2019 07:00 AM
With Lucien Avramov
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn about design, configuration and troubleshooting of the Cisco Nexus 2000, 3000, 5000 Series with cisco Expert Lucien Avramov. Lucien Avramov is a technical marketing engineer in the Server Access Virtualization Business Unit at Cisco, where he supports the Cisco Nexus 5000, 3000 and 2000 Series. He has several industry certifications including CCIE #19945 in Routing and Switching, CCDP, DCNIS, and VCP #66183
Remember to use the rating system to let Lucien know if you have received an adequate response.
Lucien might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Data Center sub-community discussion forum shortly after the event. This event lasts through October 21, 2011. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other community members.
10-17-2011 03:54 AM
Okay, so when your images match, the next step is to clear the temp space.
This would happen with a reload. In any case your upgrade will be disruptive so I will suggest you, when you have your maintenance window, to first reload the switch and then run the install all.
Providing the show system internal flash will help confirm.
10-18-2011 12:43 AM
HI Lucien ,
pls find the logs
sh system internal flash
Mount-on 1K-blocks Used Available Use-percent Filesystem
/ 204800 131672 73128 65 /dev/root
/proc 0 0 0 0 proc
/post 2048 4 2044 1 none
/sys 0 0 0 0 none
/isan 409600 309452 100148 76 none
/var/sysmgr 153600 36032 117568 24 none
/var/sysmgr/ftp 204800 28 204772 1 none
/dev/shm 262144 72344 189800 28 none
/volatile 20480 0 20480 0 none
/debug 2048 0 2048 0 none
/dev/mqueue 0 0 0 0 none
/mnt/cfg/0 38327 4292 32056 12 /dev/sda5
/mnt/cfg/1 37814 4292 31570 12 /dev/sda6
/var/sysmgr/startup-cfg 61440 2568 58872 5 none
/dev/pts 0 0 0 0 devpts
/mnt/plog 56320 1632 54688 3 /dev/mtdblock2
/mnt/pss 38343 4443 31920 13 /dev/sda4
/bootflash 834608 234832 557380 30 /dev/sda3
sh system internal log install
check_plugin_img: is_given_image_plugin_based: 1
tar: ./isan/plugin_img/core_plugin: Wrote only 7680 of 10240 bytes
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
extract_all_srgs_from_plugins: "/isan/sbin/isanadd -x /bootflash/n5000-uk9.4.0.1a.N2.1.bin . isan/plugin_img" failed
check_plugin_img: Failed to xtract SRG's from plugins within the image: -1
sh sys internal log install details
STATE_PRE_VERIFICATION to INSTALLER_STATE_NORMALIZATION.
STATE_NORMALIZATION to INSTALLER_STATE_IMAGE_VERIFICATION.
image_verify_func: successfully able to open libbootverify.so
image_verify_func: successfully able to dlsym.
Imghdr: platform type from hardware is NUOVA
Imghdr: isan image's platform type is NUOVA
Imghdr: boot image's platform type is NUOVA
42fbe4b24a1f677c859dc42bc4d69cd4
Verify OK!!
image_verify_func: rval for verify fn 0.
image_verify_func: successfully able to open libbootverify.so
image_verify_func: successfully able to dlsym.
Imghdr: platform type from hardware is NUOVA
Imghdr: isan image's platform type is NUOVA
Imghdr: boot image's platform type is NUOVA
Verify OK!!
image_verify_func: rval for verify fn 0.
le is 24626
#######################################
EXTRACT
#######################################
> extracting files: /isan/plugin_img/img.conf
--> /isan/plugin_img/img.conf
#######################################
EXTRACT
#######################################
> extracting files: isan/plugin_img
--> isan/plugin_img
Error extracting the file
extract_all_srgs_from_plugins: Extracting all srgs within plugin(s)from the image "/bootflash/n5000-uk9.4.0.1a.N2.1.bin"
extract_all_srgs_from_plugins: /tmp/extracted-srgs directory exists
extract_all_srgs_from_plugins: clearing /tmp/extracted-srgs directory
extract_all_srgs_from_plugins: Create working dir with pid 24627
extract_all_srgs_from_plugins: Executing cmd "/isan/sbin/isanadd -x /bootflash/n
5000-uk9.4.0.1a.N2.1.bin . isan/plugin_img"
extract_srg_file_func: extracting srg "/isan/etc/srg.sro" from image "/bootflash/n5000-uk9.4.0.1a.N2.1.bin".
search_extracted_srg_dir: Searching SRG "/isan/etc/srg.sro" in "/tmp/extracted-srgs"
extract_srg_file_func: extraction of srg "/isan/etc/srg.sro" from image "/bootflash/n5000-uk9.4.0.1a.N2.1.bin": rval (0x404F0003).
tallation (0), install_operation (1).
10-18-2011 03:32 AM
Your root partition is 65 % full, this is not enough for the upgrade to complete.
The next I suggest you here is to reload to remove all temporary cache files and then run the upgrade.
Keep us posted.
10-18-2011 05:37 AM
Can you pls tell me how much disk space is required to complete the installation. Also is there any option to see the temp folder usage.
10-18-2011 06:57 AM
There is no way to see the details of the root partition on your CLI, you have to follow the reload procedure and then run the install all.
10-17-2011 02:46 AM
N7k is compatible with the FEX 2224,2248 and 2232PP. We have now L3 as well on FEX from 5.2 code, meaning you can configure a FEX port as an L3 port if you desire.
Some FEX limitations:
Also here are the release notes for 5.2:
10-17-2011 10:15 AM
Hi Lucien,
Per the data sheet on the Cisco Nexus 5548 / 5596, the switches support "ACL logging and statistics". The URL is
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9670/data_sheet_c78-618603.html
I would expect to be able to use the "log" keyword in ACLs, as in "permit ip any 10.0.0.2/32 log".
However, the configuration guides don't mention the "log" option in the command syntax. Further, I found this:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3336094#3336094 which implies that logging is not supported.
Can you tell me if logging is or is not actually supported, and if not, if there is any plan to incorporate this in a future release? This is a very useful capability.
Thanks,
Paul
10-18-2011 12:02 AM
Thanks for pointing this out. We will clarify the documentation. You are absolutely right on the feature expectation. Today the hardware supports this, however it has not been implemented yet. You can discuss offline the timelines with your account team or contact me offline for more information regarding future plans on this feature.
10-18-2011 10:39 AM
Hi Lucien,
Looking at the Nexus 3064 for ultra low latency in our multicast environment, but limited to 64x10Gigports.
We are thinking of creating a port channel between two 3064 using 2x40Gig interfaces as the interconnect to increase port capacity. The question is how much latency will be added between two host, one on each 3064. I understand that latency varies on
packet size, buffer, etc., but lets say the two devices are sending traffic to each other with fixed packet size with a steady stream and no microbursts.
What other solution do you recommend if my environment consist of 70+ servers (need to be on same broadcast domain) and is in need of a ultra low latency solution? <1us
Eddie O.
10-18-2011 11:56 PM
In your Ultra Low Latency environment, you mention multicast. Let's take for example packet sizes between 64 and 512 bytes. In this case, 40 GE is actually the best choice. Using 40 GE as aggregation in the following scheme : Topology 1: 10GE server ---nexus 3k---(40GE)--nexus3k---(40GE)---nexus3k----10GE
Topology 2: 10GE server ---nexus 3k---(10GE)--nexus3k---(10GE)---nexus3k----10GE
Topology 1, even though it is store-forward mode for the end to end latency (since there is a 10->40 GE) will save you between .260 usec up to .580 usec for packet sizes between 64 and 512 bytes.
I'd recommend you to have a 40 GE aggregation, this will give you predictable latency and will let you scale to a high number of servers if you need growth.
10-19-2011 12:48 AM
Hi Lucien,
I don't know if it is a corrcet forum to ask this questing in this forum or not but I am having a problem at hand and i need few answere based on LAN (VRRP/HSRP) feature.
Actually we are having ES+ cards (on 7609) and we are using multiple groups(say 350 vrrp groups) running on the router . the routers are connected as
router 1>>> mux(which is working as switches)>>> router2
my questing are
1. does their will be "multicast packets" (for VRRP group) "from backup router to Master router" also when in stable state( ie when Master and backup are already chosen) or the packet from backup to master should be usnicast
I know for sure the packet from master to back is multicast packets
I am not sure but I think from backup to master it should be multicast
2. what is frequency of these packets( from backup to master)
3. As i have multiper group on a single interface ( we are using q-in-q), when the connectivity from router's is broken, then does all the groups will muticast their active roll in the lan sengment "at once" or it will be in a groups say 100 groups at once, and after few ms few 100's and sone ( as is on OSPF or RIP)
we are in between troubleshooting I hope we get the ans
Thanks in advance
Warm regards
Vinay Verma
10-19-2011 05:45 AM
Please try posting your question on the LAN forum:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/network-infrastructure/switching
10-19-2011 06:00 AM
Ciao Lucien,
Are you aware about the NX-OS version 6 and when it will be released?
I know that this question is not pertinent with this section, but I'm studing a solution for a customer and it will be a great thing insert in the solution (it's a 7010) the new Fabric2 and N7K-F248XP-25 linecard (which is not clear about the L2/L3 support and other things, as per my request in another post)... but both of them are supported with NX-OS 6 :-(
Another question (this one for the N2K-C2148T-1GE): if I understand correctly this device can connect to two N5K in these ways:
Is this right?
Tnx in advance if u can help!
Ciao!
Luciano
10-19-2011 06:18 AM
Thanks for your question. I can not publish on this forum the release timeframes for 6.0 NX-OS and the best contact point for you to get this information is your Cisco Account Team.
Regarding vPC:
1) You can use with 2148T up to, 2 links going to N5k-1 and 2 other links going to N5K-2 : all the 4 uplinks can therefore be used. All those links can be in a PO which is a ''vPC".
2) Sure that is correct
In short, on any fabric extenders (2148,2200s..) you can use all the uplinks if you desire, the minimum is 1 uplink.
Here is how to configure either case (look at figure 4 and figure 5.):
10-19-2011 06:32 AM
Ciao Lucien,
tnx for the info but I'm a little confused (maybe it's due to my poor english ), for case 1 (vPC) it's stated:
"The Cisco Nexus 2148T supports two-link PortChannels, with a maximum of one port per fabric extender. The Cisco Nexus 2148T thus supports only vPCs with a total of two ports. Figure 23 illustrates the topologies that the Cisco Nexus 2148T supports"
on page 32 of "Chapter 6 Data Center Access Design with Cisco Nexus 5000 Series Switches and 2000 Series Fabric Extenders and Virtual PortChannels"
Ciao!
Luciano
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide