11-28-2012 05:01 AM - edited 03-01-2019 07:13 AM
Hi
can anyone tell me the difference between figure 1-8 and figure 1-14 in this document?
fig 1-8 is supported topolgy in ISSU
but not fig 1-14.
i do not see the difference in topology from N5k point of view.
Thank you,
ivan
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-28-2012 09:39 PM
The 2 5K's are not attached to any upstream switches. Therefore the N5K must be the Spanning-tree root of the topology and thus ISSU is not supported.
To support ISSU on the N5K, the 5K's can not be root for any VLAN, and all 5K interfaces must be Root port or Edge port. So, no switches attached to the N5K's except the root VPC north bound.
Dan Ryan, NCE
Cisco Systems, Inc
11-28-2012 09:39 PM
The 2 5K's are not attached to any upstream switches. Therefore the N5K must be the Spanning-tree root of the topology and thus ISSU is not supported.
To support ISSU on the N5K, the 5K's can not be root for any VLAN, and all 5K interfaces must be Root port or Edge port. So, no switches attached to the N5K's except the root VPC north bound.
Dan Ryan, NCE
Cisco Systems, Inc
11-29-2012 07:46 PM
Thanks Dan!
how about if in figure 1-8, blade switches is connected directly to N5K ports with VPC.
Since the requirement is no STP in running to downstream switch,
is it mean i need to define the VPC as stp type edge trunk and filter BPDU?
which means the blade switch will run its own STP and become the root itself?
or this kind of topology is not supported for ISSU?
Thanks,
Ivan
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide