Nexus 7k multiple OSPF dedicated neighbor SVIs over peer link?
Just collapsed an area into an existing 7k environment. The legacy area X had one dedicated SVI ospf relationship over the peer link. After collapsing a new area Y into the 7k infrastructure, I lost peer reachability to connected /30s in Y...makes sense. In order to remediate properly, Im thinking I can turn up a new dedicated /30 SVI on the 7ks and place them in the new area Y. Does anyone see an issue with having two ospf area relationships over the peer link ? Area X and area Y. Also I will need to replicate this two more times, meaning two additional /30 SVIs in new areas, as there are two more areas to collapse. In the end, this would leave 4 ospf neighborships over the vpc peer link in four different areas.
How does everyone feel about service graphs in a brownfield network centric cutover? maybe I'm an old school engineer but I was taught that if you have to do a Pbr then your design is wrong. they are a pain to troubleshoot because you always f...
To participate in this event, please use the button to ask your questions
This special event - formerly known as Ask the Expert- is open only to Cisco Customers and Partners.
Many pages in the Cisco Community are acce...
Going to Cisco LIVE EMEAR 2020? Give your Data Center agenda a boost with these top recommended sessions. Register and join us!
Data Center Networking:
From Reactive to Proactive NetOps With Cisco Network Assurance and Insights- The Power of Data...
Hi allWe're trying to tackle a DHCP relay problem between a set of N9K-C9332PQ (NXOS 9.3.2) and dnsmasq (doesn't work) resp Windows 2016 DHCP service (works with some tweaking).SITUATION:We have a BGP EVPN VXLAN (L2VNI and L3VNI) with anycast gateway setu...