05-08-2006 06:01 AM - edited 03-03-2019 03:07 AM
Hi guys and girls,
I'm experiencing a rather annoying thing in a clients network.
Here's the setup:
2 Cisco Catalyst 6509 with SUP720
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-JK9SV-M), Version 12.2(18)SXD5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2005 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 13-May-05 19:15 by ssearch
Image text-base: 0x4002100C, data-base: 0x42698000
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)S2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
BOOTLDR: s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-JK9SV-M), Version 12.2(18)SXD5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
Here's the essentials out of my configuration:
mls ip multicast flow-stat-timer 9
no mls flow ip
no mls flow ipv6
mls cef error action freeze
spanning-tree mode pvst
no spanning-tree optimize bpdu transmission
redundancy
mode sso
main-cpu
auto-sync running-config
interface Vlan7
description XXXXX
ip vrf forwarding XXXXX
ip address XXX.XXX.XXX.61 255.255.255.0
ip access-group XXXXX in
no ip redirects
standby 1 ip XXX.XXX.XXX.60
standby 1 authentication XXXXX
router bgp XXXXX
bgp log-neighbor-changes
address-family ipv4 vrf XXXXX
neighbor XXX.XXX.XXX.62 remote-as XXXXX
neighbor XXX.XXX.XXX.62 activate
no auto-summary
no synchronization
network XXX.XXX.XXX.0 mask 255.255.255.0
exit-address-family
ip vrf XXXXX
rd 1:7
route-target export 1:7
My problem is this, when I am at one VLAN and ping's a device on another VLAN i get response times like this:
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid=248ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid=97ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid=209ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid=9ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid=48ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid < 1 ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid=3ms TTL=127
Response from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX: byte=32 tid=9ms TTL=127
I have tried to connect two PC's to the same physical card in one off my 6509's just at two seperate VLANs and I still have the same problem.
If anyone has any ideas I would be more than happy to hear, if you need to see some more config just post a replie here.
Thanks in advance
/Jens Boberg
05-08-2006 09:21 AM
Am I in the wrong forum, or doesn't anyone have a clue.. any response is appreciated.
05-08-2006 11:31 AM
Whats the actual bandwidth utilization? Is it heavily taxed?
05-08-2006 09:22 PM
Hi,
No it's not heavily taxed, there isn't to much traffic going through the, and the CPU looks fine to, here's the % from the CPU.
CPU utilization for five seconds: 7%/1%; one minute: 7%; five minutes: 7%
05-09-2006 09:26 PM
Still no one who has a clue?
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide