12-24-2003 02:21 AM - edited 03-02-2019 12:32 PM
We're experiencing a performance problem with our 7200/NPE-G1 router. When doing an FTP session across the router, we noticed that performance was only 30-50 Mbit. When the test hosts are on the same network, performance is the full 100 Mbit the hosts are connected with. We also tried connecting the test hosts directly to the router interfaces, one interface for eac host, in a plain vanilla configuration. Performance was the same. When using simple bandwidth testtools like NetCPS the results are similar.
When testing in the same way over a 6500/MSFC2 performance was line speed, as expected.
MRTG monitoring seems to indicate that aggregate performance is higher than this, but we've been unable to get a single end to end test to go higher than 50 Mbps.
The router is configured to use CEF, and as far as we can tell, CEF is working properly.
Does anyone know what could be causing this? I would expect the NPE-G1 to be capable of handing 100 Mbps...
Below the configuration as we use it. G0/1 and g0/2 were used only for end-to-end testing, the .1q test used vlans 202 and 203 on g0/3
!
ip subnet-zero
ip multicast-routing
ip cef
!
buffers small permanent 150
buffers small max-free 300
buffers small min-free 50
buffers middle permanent 40
buffers middle min-free 20
buffers big permanent 60
buffers big min-free 10
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
no negotiation auto
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
no negotiation auto
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
ip address 10.110.2.251 255.255.0.0
no ip proxy-arp
ip pim dense-mode
duplex full
speed 1000
media-type rj45
no negotiation auto
standby 1 ip 10.110.2.90
standby 1 priority 110
standby 1 preempt
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/3.202
description Interface naar LAN202_HK
encapsulation dot1Q 202
ip address 10.202.2.251 255.255.0.0
ip helper-address 10.201.2.53
ip helper-address 10.211.2.53
ip helper-address 10.203.1.10
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ip pim dense-mode
standby 202 ip 10.202.2.90
standby 202 priority 110
standby 202 preempt
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/3.203
description Interface naar LAN203_HK
encapsulation dot1Q 203
ip address 10.203.2.251 255.255.0.0
ip helper-address 10.201.2.53
ip helper-address 10.211.2.53
ip helper-address 10.214.1.2
ip helper-address 10.213.1.11
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ip pim dense-mode
standby 203 ip 10.203.2.90
standby 203 priority 110
standby 203 preempt
!
!
ip classless
!
12-30-2003 07:39 AM
I would suggest you to try changing the " buffers big permanent "parameter. This might help you. .I am aware that some images of 7200 support two PCI buses , one for odd slot and one for even slots. So if you overload any one of the bus the performance degrades. If you have two cards put one on odd and other in even, or you might have to upgrade the image on the router.
12-30-2003 08:13 AM
I assume your results were using a single FTP session to the host machine ? What happens if you open up 2 or more FTP sessions simultaneously.
ie, If you are topping out at 50Mbit with 1 session and you open another, does the first drop to 25Mbit or do both of them actually run at around 50Mbit.
The issue could just be the latency of the TCP conversation.
= K
01-20-2004 04:21 AM
Your last comment made me check that, and related issues out. As it turns out, the issue was TCP windows size, with an appropriately large windows speed was wire speed.
Thanks.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: