05-20-2004 01:38 AM - edited 03-02-2019 03:49 PM
Following router/IOS/WAN upgrade OSPF is not advertising the subnet associated with the Loopback interface. It does however advertise the actual Loopback interface address. The subnet associated with the Loopback interface is used for NAT translations.
System image file is "flash:c2600-is-mz.122-23.bin"
interface Loopback0
ip address 172.18.33.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.3.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 172.16.10.101 255.255.248.0
ip access-group 110 in
no ip redirects
ip nat inside
speed 10
half-duplex
no cdp enable
!
interface BRI0/0
no ip address
ip nat outside
encapsulation ppp
no ip mroute-cache
dialer rotary-group 1
isdn switch-type basic-net3
no fair-queue
no cdp enable
!
interface ATM1/0
description *** 2Mbps CellStream ***
bandwidth 2048
no ip address
no ip mroute-cache
logging event subif-link-status
no atm ilmi-keepalive
scrambling-payload
impedance 120-ohm
!
interface ATM1/0.1 point-to-point
bandwidth 1024
ip address 172.31.5.70 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
pvc Risley 1/32
vbr-nrt 1024 1024 64000
oam-pvc manage
encapsulation aal5snap
!
!
interface ATM1/0.2 point-to-point
bandwidth 1024
ip address 172.29.1.58 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
pvc SunGard 1/34
vbr-nrt 1024 1024 64000
oam-pvc manage
encapsulation aal5snap
!
!
interface ATM1/1
no ip address
shutdown
no atm ilmi-keepalive
scrambling-payload
impedance 120-ohm
!
interface ATM1/2
no ip address
shutdown
no atm ilmi-keepalive
scrambling-payload
impedance 120-ohm
!
interface ATM1/3
no ip address
shutdown
no atm ilmi-keepalive
scrambling-payload
impedance 120-ohm
!
interface Dialer1
bandwidth 1
ip address 172.18.48.17 255.255.255.0
ip nat outside
encapsulation ppp
dialer in-band
dialer idle-timeout 300
dialer map ip 172.18.48.1 name foxrtr-ris03 broadcast *****830874
dialer hold-queue 10
dialer-group 1
no fair-queue
no cdp enable
ppp authentication chap
!
router ospf 100
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute connected metric-type 1 subnets
redistribute static
passive-interface FastEthernet0/0
network 172.18.33.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 172.18.48.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 172.29.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 172.31.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
distribute-list 2 out
!
ip nat pool pj 172.18.33.20 172.18.33.254 netmask 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside source list 1 pool pj
ip nat inside source static 172.16.9.86 172.18.33.14
ip nat inside source static 172.16.8.247 172.18.33.13
ip nat inside source static 172.16.9.97 172.18.33.5
ip nat inside source static 172.16.9.28 172.18.33.4
ip nat inside source static 172.16.9.132 172.18.33.11
ip nat inside source static 172.16.13.24 172.18.33.2
ip nat inside source static 172.16.9.77 172.18.33.7
ip nat inside source static 172.16.9.53 172.18.33.3
ip nat inside source static 172.16.8.75 172.18.33.9
ip nat inside source static 172.16.18.3 172.18.33.12
ip nat inside source static 172.16.9.71 172.18.33.6
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.18.48.1 150
ip http server
!
access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 1 permit 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 1 permit 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 1 permit 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 2 deny 192.168.3.0
access-list 2 deny 172.16.8.0
access-list 2 deny 172.16.0.0
access-list 2 permit any
05-26-2004 01:38 AM
My current OSPF neighbour is across subinterface ATM1/0.1, this is correct.
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
172.18.48.1 1 FULL/ - 00:00:38 172.31.5.69 ATM1/0.1
I can see that Router Link State advertisiements are being generated locally and propogated into the backbone, however the underlying stub network isn't even when redistributing 'Connected'.
I hope I haven't misinterpreted what the OSPF protocol will do and I have other working examples where the stub network associated with the Loopback interface are advertised.
I've attached the output from "show ip ospf interface", note that I have reverted the network type for the Loopback interface.
Dialer1 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
Internet Address 172.18.48.17/24, Area 0
Process ID 100, Router ID 172.18.33.1, Network Type POINT_TO_POINT, Cost: 65535
Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
No Hellos (Passive interface)
Index 2/2, flood queue length 0
Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 1
Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec
Neighbor Count is 0, Adjacent neighbor count is 0
Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s)
ATM1/0.1 is up, line protocol is up
Internet Address 172.31.5.70/30, Area 0
Process ID 100, Router ID 172.18.33.1, Network Type POINT_TO_POINT, Cost: 97
Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
Hello due in 00:00:06
Index 4/4, flood queue length 0
Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 40
Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec
Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1
Adjacent with neighbor 172.18.48.1
Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s)
ATM1/0.2 is down, line protocol is down
Internet Address 172.29.1.58/30, Area 0
Process ID 100, Router ID 172.18.33.1, Network Type POINT_TO_POINT, Cost: 97
Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DOWN,
Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
Loopback0 is up, line protocol is up
Internet Address 172.18.33.1/24, Area 0
Process ID 100, Router ID 172.18.33.1, Network Type LOOPBACK, Cost: 1
Loopback interface is treated as a stub Host
foxrtr-tvbc02#
I will be trying your recommendation of using another IP subnet on the loopback tonight.
05-26-2004 01:48 AM
Did changing the ospf network type not work? From the outpuit of the sho ip ospf ne command I see that you are still advertising only the loopback as a host route, and not as a full network. Add the ?ip ospf net point-to-p" command under the loopback interface, and the issue clear ip ospf proc. the take a look at the sh ip opsg int again, and see if the changes show up making loopback0 a point-to-point network.
Joe
05-26-2004 02:49 AM
Funny question, because I guess you must have done it already.
Have you tried to do a clear ip route * ?
This is after specifying the loopback as a point to point.
05-26-2004 03:00 AM
not specifically although this would have been taken care of by virtue of the number of reloads I've performed.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide