08-05-2004 05:29 AM - edited 03-09-2019 08:19 AM
We have a router running NAT with a NAT stats output as below (changing ip address info for security reasons). Cisco docs say the last stat of 68064 misses is
"Number of failed allocations from the pool.".
Would I be correct in thinking that this means
the pool was depleted and so a session could not be
created, as opposed to a translation miss, where a
translation is not in table and so is created ?
I.e. the single ip address for NAT is not enough ?
rgds
Martyn Beck
RTR-0#sho ip nat statistics
Total active translations: 67 (36 static, 31 dynamic; 31 extended)
Outside interfaces:
FastEthernet1/0
Inside interfaces:
FastEthernet0/0, FastEthernet0/1, GigabitEthernet2/0
Hits: -1951802804 Misses: 204526
Expired translations: 305447
Dynamic mappings:
-- Inside Source
access-list 1 pool pool1 refcount 25
pool pool1: netmask 255.255.255.0
start 1.2.3.4 end 1.2.3.4
type generic, total addresses 1, allocated 1 (100%), misses 68064
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-05-2004 05:56 AM
You would be correct. misses (with the small m) are failed allocations from a pool, such as when all addresses in a pool are already allocated.
Scott
08-05-2004 05:56 AM
You would be correct. misses (with the small m) are failed allocations from a pool, such as when all addresses in a pool are already allocated.
Scott
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide