05-08-2003 10:58 AM - edited 03-09-2019 03:13 AM
Hi,
I just upgraded our two VPN 3000 concentrators to 3.6.7F to fix the security vulnerabilities. However, after upgrading I am no longer able to access through the virtual IP address. Access through both real IP address works, but attempts to the virtual address does not even appear in the logs. In the load balancing statistics I can see that both concentrators are aware of each other and both agree who is the master and who is secondary.
The client I use is 3.6.3(B) running on Windows 2000. We use IPSec over TCP port 10000 to access the concentrators.
Any help would be appreciated!
Regards,
Harald
05-24-2003 03:46 AM
Dear Jazib,
Here is the result when searching the bug ID you mention above.
Why Cisco doesn`t open the BUG to the public ?
Sorry -- The defect you have requested CSCea09329 cannot be displayed.
This may be due to one or more of the following:
The defect number does not exist.
The defect does not have a customer-visible description available yet.
The defect has been marked Cisco Confidential.
05-28-2003 11:42 AM
I believe Cisco has opened a new bug on this. The new number is CSCeb18649. It is listed as only affecting V4.0.1. If you are having the same problem with this version (or as mentioned in other forum articles with the 3.6.7 F version) you may want to open a TAC case, I'm sure they could use some more data points.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide