Application Bundles: A Better Approach than Data Service Bundles?
I believe that tiered data service bundles (5, 10, 50, 100, 500...) Mega Bytes per month, while simpler to explain and easier to integrate with billing systems, is merely a spiral towards lower and lower revenue per mega byte consumed. Is this a dead-end pricing philosophy that often promotes massive consumption from the least profitable customers. The only thing worse is the All You Can Eat pricing model!
I believe there is a better way. Application-based bundle of services to subscribers, both business and general consumers. A timely SMS may have more value than a mega byte of data. A turbo VPN service may have more value than best effort from an airport. You get the idea.
This simple change in strategy yields numerous benefits.
Meaningful customer segmentation to accommodate both the short tail and long tail consumers
Vertical based (retail, healthcare, education, manufacturing, etc.) The apps can be loaded by the mobile operators on the handsets based on the customer profile.
Legal price discrimination based on relevance and application value
Accommodates both long-term bundles and ad hoc bundles
Helps graduate customers towards increased maturity through integration of voice, video, data, mobility, and collaboration applications. For example, regular consumers may get a basic bundle of services (voice, SMS) while advanced users might get advanced bundle of services such as WebEx, VPN, Video Conferencing or Consumer Telepresence, Unified Communications, etc. The premise is higher the maturity of service bundles, greater the stickiness, higher the ARPU, and lower the churn.
Delivers valuable personalization with customer context (location/presence, profile, security, QoS, as determined by the apps)
And there are more benefits than what I have listed.
Architecting the network to support these apps will call for pervasive deep packet inspection, policy based network services for dynamic user segmentation in real-time, scalability and performance, OSS/BSS integration, to name a few critical capabilities. And a lot of these can become federated services with network APIs that application developers can access.
So, why haven't the (mobile) operators adopted application based bundling and pricing scheme on a broader scale? What network capabilities are critical success factors? How would over the top apps fit into this discussion?
Check out our latest release on Cisco Routed Optical Networking solution. Listen: https://smarturl.it/CCRS8E24Follow us: https://twitter.com/ciscochampion Disruptive network transformation may only happen once a decade. First movers c...
BGP flowspec in a nutshell is a feature that will allow you to receive IPv4/IPv6 traffic flow specification (source X, destination Y, protocol UDP, source port A .. etc) and actions that need to be taken on that traffic (drop, or polic...
In EVPN A/A + IRB both PE in same EVI have BVI playing a default GW role. Its not supported to have BVI to be shutdown on one of PEs, In this case if if traffic hit this PE with DMAc equal to BVI Custom MAC, then it will drop this traffic du...
Crosswork Cloud - Crosswork Traffic Analysis - FAQ
Crosswork Cloud - Crosswork Traffic Analysis is a Cloud-hosted Software as a Service platform that provides Netflow based Traffic Analytics. The Crosswork Traffic Analysis platform Traffic Analysis, Peeri...
Cisco Champion Radio · S8|E9 Innovations to Achieve a Trustworthy Infrastructure
How do you know for certain that a router in your network has not been altered with since you deployed it? Wouldn’t it be great if you can cryptographically challenge your r...