I'm looking for stability information on 22.214.171.124. I have recently been told by TAC that an issue I am having is resolved in 126.96.36.199 and seeing as it is the newest version of 7.6 I want to make sure that there are not connectivity issues for clients and there are no issues on MESH network.
The controller is a 5508 running 188.8.131.52 and has many mesh links. the roots are 1522 and 24 and the mesh APs are 1522, 1524 and 1242. The bug that is being fixed is CSCui86001.
yes 184.108.40.206 version is ok :
Please check for open caveats :
this one worries me as those are the types of SSIDs I use. I am not currently having it in 220.127.116.11
I cannot just reboot this controller as I have wire VoIP devices that rely on the mesh connections.
I was also hoping to hear from people who are using this release in Production and if they have had issue or if it has been stable.
Yes this issue is resolved in 18.104.22.168.
This is pretty new version so not many have this is in production.
Suggest: Always keep the second highest version for your controller , its a best practice to have because of new bugs in new version .
You have 2 bugs, one in 7.6.100. and othe rin 22.214.171.124.
SO to fix on thing I need to go to 126.96.36.199 but that could cause me issues.
If you had to choose between 188.8.131.52 and 184.108.40.206 which on would you choose as the one I have right now is deferred.
Best bet is to load in a lab and then slowly push out. Sometimes the bugs listed may never impact you, instead you may find yourself finding the undocumented ones. I have a friend in mining who has a large mesh network and I understand he is on 220.127.116.11.
I don't have any mesh on my controller with 18.104.22.168.
Unfortunately my company does not have a lab environment I would love to but the funds are not there.
Have you had any issue with client access on your controller?
The bug I pointed out below actually will not affect me as I don't use NAC on my SSIDs.