cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Who Me Too'd this topic

PBR with PPP Dialer interface - ATM vs PPPoE

Michael Mercier
Level 1
Level 1

Hello,

I seem to be having an issue with Policy Based Routing on a Dialer interface.  I have the following two setups:

A.  Cisco router with ADSL WIC - relevant configuration information

interface ATM0/0/0

  no ip address

  no atm ilmi-keepalive

  pvc 0/35

    pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1

interface FastEthernet0/1

  ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x

  ip nat inside

  ip policy route-map dialer1-access

interface Dialer1

  ip address negotiated

  ip nat outside

  encapsulation ppp

  dialer pool 1

route-map dialer1-access permit 10

  match ip address acl_dialer1_permit

  set default interface Dialer1

B. Cisco router Ethernet interface connected to DSL modem via switch - relevant configuration information

interface GigabitEthernet0/2.220

  encapsulation dot1q 220

  pppoe enable

  pppoe-client dial-pool-number 10

interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x

  ip nat inside

  ip policy route-map dialer10-access

interface Dialer10

  ip address negotiated

  ip nat outside

  encapsulation ppp

  dialer pool 10

route-map dialer10-access permit 10

  match ip address acl_dialer10_access

  set default interface Dialer10

There is no static default route (ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0) on either setup.  Setup A works for me successfully.   As configured, setup B does not seem to correctly 'route' the traffic (connection fails)?  If I add the following command to the Dialer interface,

ppp ipcp route default

then connections succeed but I believe this is because there is now a static default route installed which I don't want.

Questions: 

1. Is there a way around this? 

2. Is this behaviour different when using PPPoE vs ATM?

Thanks,

Mike

Who Me Too'd this topic