01-12-2023 04:11 AM
Hi all,
I have 2 Switches (Catalyst 9200 & SG-350). Both are connected with Trunk port. I am making SG-350 my root switch running on Rapid-Pvst. Configurations as follows:
=====Catalyst 9200=====
1) #sh run:
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
spanning-tree portfast default
spanning-tree portfast bpduguard
spanning-tree extend system-id
2) #sh spanning-tree active
Vlan 1234
spanning tree enabled protocol rstp
Root ID Priority 32768
Address xxxx.xxxx.xxxx
Cost 4
Port 1(GIgabitEthernet 1/0/1)
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 Sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 34002 (priority 32768 sys_id ext 1234)
Address yyyy.yyyy.yyyy
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 Sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
--------- ---- --- ---- -------- -----
Gi1/0/1 Root Fwd 4 128.1 P2p
=====SG-350=====
1) #sh run:
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
2) #sh spanning-tree active
Root ID Priority 32768
Address xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx
This switch is the root
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 Sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Name State Prior.Nbr Cost Sts Role PortFast Type
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
gi2 enabled 128.2 20000 Frw Desg No P2p (rpvst)
* Port Type or PVID Inconsistency // Warning I am trying to get rid of
=====End=====
I am encountering "* Port Type or PVID Inconsistency" , however when I run #sh spanning-tree inconsistency, no ports showed up as inconsistent. My network is still functioning as per normal but I am worried that "* Port Type or PVID Inconsistency" may cause issues in future.
Troubleshooting methods I have tried:
1) Shut and no shut the trunk port
2) Change both switches to pvst instead of rapid-pvst
Could it be because of the MAC address format is different for both switch? Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks!