cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Who Me Too'd this topic

* Port Type or PVID Inconsistency

antotini
Level 1
Level 1

Hi all, 

I have 2 Switches (Catalyst 9200 & SG-350). Both are connected with Trunk port. I am making SG-350 my root switch running on Rapid-Pvst. Configurations as follows: 

=====Catalyst 9200=====
1) #sh run: 
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
spanning-tree portfast default
spanning-tree portfast bpduguard
spanning-tree extend system-id

2) #sh spanning-tree active
Vlan 1234
spanning tree enabled protocol rstp
Root ID Priority 32768
Address xxxx.xxxx.xxxx
Cost 4
Port 1(GIgabitEthernet 1/0/1)
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 Sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 34002 (priority 32768 sys_id ext 1234)
Address yyyy.yyyy.yyyy
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 Sec Forward Delay 15 sec

Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
--------- ---- --- ---- -------- -----
Gi1/0/1 Root Fwd 4 128.1 P2p


=====SG-350=====
1) #sh run:
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst

2) #sh spanning-tree active
Root ID Priority 32768
Address xx.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx
This switch is the root
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 Sec Forward Delay 15 sec

Name State Prior.Nbr Cost Sts Role PortFast Type
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
gi2 enabled 128.2 20000 Frw Desg No P2p (rpvst)

* Port Type or PVID Inconsistency             // Warning I am trying to get rid of

=====End=====

I am encountering "* Port Type or PVID Inconsistency" , however when I run #sh spanning-tree inconsistency, no ports showed up as inconsistent. My network is still functioning as per normal but I am worried that "* Port Type or PVID Inconsistency" may cause issues in future. 

Troubleshooting methods I have tried: 
1) Shut and no shut the trunk port 
2) Change both switches to pvst instead of rapid-pvst 

Could it be because of the MAC address format is different for both switch? Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks!

 

Who Me Too'd this topic