cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

Who Me Too'd this topic

Full Routing Table : label-allocation-mode per-vrf vs per-ce NCS5500

What will be the recommended label-allocation-mode   for a network with three NCS55A2 peering with other ISP getting full routes from the Internet (898752 total router).  The default is label allocation per prefix, but when I peer with another provider. I was getting a lot of these messages: See also attached file.   I changed it to label-allocation-mode per VRF, and the logs when away.  My question is what's the recommended setting in this type of scenario?  My understanding is that the NCS55A2 is running out of local labels and that's why it's can allocate a label per prefix.  I thought about extending the local label range from local-block 15000 15999  to local-block 15000 15999 to local-block 15000 1048575, and that should be enough for all prefixes. Or I can change the label-allocation-mode to per CE, and every prefix will get the same label per vrf  per CE. but I don't  know the recommended mode. Advice?

ipv4_rib[1260]: %L2-GRID-4-BANK_FULL : GRID POOL:GLIF(2), BANK 1 FULL. Max size 178128, Curr RIDs 178127.

16:11:02.869 § LC/0/0/CPU0:Jan 13 16:07:35.873 EST: fib_mgr[184]: %PLATFORM-PLAT_FIB-3-HW_PROG_ERROR : HW Programming failed for table,ipnhgroup,key,0xe303d40000e620,unit,0,dpa_trans_id,1945286,failure-reason,NoResrc
16:11:02.870 § LC/0/0/CPU0:Jan 13 16:07:35.876 EST: fib_mgr[184]: ti queue ext 218 Failed to create queue-ext for object for object:[ref:1 count:1 depth:2 ldi:0x3145005098 ext:0x30e50da1e8 type:Encap-shared flags:[mpls ext, recursive, imp, pd shared] flags2:[] extn_flags:[] intn_flags:[orig-pd-share] timestamp:Jan 13 16:07:35.872]

Who Me Too'd this topic