04-13-2013 10:31 AM - edited 03-04-2019 07:35 PM
Hi All,
I have a problem reaching the internet from my second cascaded network 10.1.1.0 on Cisco 3550.
I can reach the internet while I'm using the network 192.168.1.0, but when ever I try from 10.1.1.0 I always get request timed out.
Here is the topology:
Here is the configuration:
Linksys X300:
Not much on it 2 static routes.
ip route 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.3
ip route 41.68.42.89(public) 255.255.255.255 172.31.1.122(first hop)
Linksys E900: >> IP address only
Cisco 3550:
Enabled ip routing
default route >> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1
Ip default-gateway 192.168.1.1
ip name-server 192.168.1.1
SVI interface vlan 10
ip add 10.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
int fa 0/24
no switchport
ip add 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0
Tests
Lastly I tried to ping from the cisco 3550 to 172.31.1.122 with source ip 10.1.1.3 and it also gave me the same request timed out.
Can you please help me guys I know I'm missing something and I dont know it and it is driving me nuts.
Thanks,
Solved! Go to Solution.
04-13-2013 05:57 PM
Are you NATing the affected subnet?
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
04-14-2013 12:32 PM
Hello Allam,
As SOcchiogrosso said, it would be probably problem with NAT.
do I need to perform NATing for the second subnet? shouldn't it work as long as im routing it to the internet gateway?
Yes you have to perform NAT for both your private subnets (192.168.1.0/24 and 10.1.1.0/24).
I assume that you are NATing 192.168.1.0/24 on Linksys X300 to your public IP, so ISP can return traffic back. But if you do not NAT 10.1.1.0/24 subnet, ISP will drop these packets because they are destinated to private networks (which is not allowed in internet) and also for your ISP it is uknown traffic.
Best Regards
Please rate all helpful posts and close solved questions
04-13-2013 05:57 PM
Are you NATing the affected subnet?
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App
04-14-2013 03:03 AM
No. do I need to perform NATing for the second subnet? shouldn't it work as long as im routing it to the internet gateway?
Thanks for relping.
04-14-2013 02:17 AM
Hello
You don't state where this 172.x network is residing
It could be172.x hasn't a return path to 10.1.x network
Also on your 3560 you don't need ip default-gateway when you have routing enabled
A simple topology of this network would help us to understand this better
Res
Paul
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
04-14-2013 03:08 AM
Thanks for repling.
I didnt mention it as it out of my breach. It belongs to ISP, I've known about it when I did a trace route.
Tracing route to yahoo.com [98.139.183.24]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms X3000 [192.168.1.1]
2 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 172.31.1.122 <<<<<<<
3 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 172.21.28.178
4 11 ms 10 ms 11 ms ^C
04-14-2013 12:32 PM
Hello Allam,
As SOcchiogrosso said, it would be probably problem with NAT.
do I need to perform NATing for the second subnet? shouldn't it work as long as im routing it to the internet gateway?
Yes you have to perform NAT for both your private subnets (192.168.1.0/24 and 10.1.1.0/24).
I assume that you are NATing 192.168.1.0/24 on Linksys X300 to your public IP, so ISP can return traffic back. But if you do not NAT 10.1.1.0/24 subnet, ISP will drop these packets because they are destinated to private networks (which is not allowed in internet) and also for your ISP it is uknown traffic.
Best Regards
Please rate all helpful posts and close solved questions
04-16-2013 10:33 AM
Finally I can live in peace
Thank you all I appreciate it!
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: