cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2010
Views
15
Helpful
8
Replies

BGP multipath using single path

Daniel Graham
Level 1
Level 1

I have BGP multi-path setup but only one router in AS65222 is receiving traffic for the prefix 192.0.2.254.

 

Goal is to have traffic from cloud distributed between AS65222 routers to the anycast ip.

 

Thoughts on what is going wrong here?

 

Topology is:

                 topo.png

 

 

192.0.2.1# show run
router bgp 65111
router-id 192.0.2.1
neighbor 192.0.2.2 remote as 65222
neighbor 192.0.2.3 remote as 65222
address-family ipv4
maximum-paths 2
# show ip route
192.0.2.254/32, ubest/mbest: 2/0
*via 192.0.2.2, [20/0], 00:12:48, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222
*via 192.0.2.3, [20/0], 00:12:48, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222
# show ip bgp 192.0.2.254/32
BGP routing table information for VRF default, address family IPv4 Unicast BGP routing table entry for 192.0.2.254/32, version 411 Paths: (2 available, best #1) Flags: (0x00001a) on xmit-list, is in urib, is best urib route Multipath: eBGP Advertised path-id 1 Path type: external, path is valid, received and used, is best path AS-Path: 65222 , path sourced external to AS 192.0.2.2 (metric 0) from 192.0.2.2 (192.0.2.2) Origin IGP, MED not set, localpref 100, weight 0 Path type: external, path is valid, received and used, not best reason: Router Id, multipath AS-Path: 65222 , path sourced external to AS 192.0.2.3 (metric 0) from 192.0.2.3 (192.0.2.3) Origin IGP, MED not set, localpref 100, weight 0 Path-id 1 advertised to peers: 192.0.2.2
# show ip bgp
BGP routing table information for VRF default, address family IPv4 Unicast BGP table version is 414, local router ID is 192.0.2.1 Status: s-suppressed, x-deleted, S-stale, d-dampened, h-history, *-valid, >-best Path type: i-internal, e-external, c-confed, l-local, a-aggregate, r-redist Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete, | - multipath Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *>e192.0.2.254/32 192.0.2.2 0 65222 i *|e 192.0.2.3 0 65222 i

 

 

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Hello @Daniel Graham ,

the last show tells what the device is actually doing

It makes an EXOR of the last byte of source with destination and then an EXOR with the random seed value 237.

 

192.0.2.1# show ip load-sharing
IPv4/IPv6 ECMP load sharing:
Universal-id (Random Seed): 237
Load-share mode : address source-destination

 

It is not so immediate to find two flows that take a different path.

 

Hope to help

Giuseppe

 

View solution in original post

8 Replies 8

Giuseppe Larosa
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hello @Daniel Graham ,

BGP multipath is configured and working

show ip route
192.0.2.254/32, ubest/mbest: 2/0
*via 192.0.2.2, [20/0], 00:12:48, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222
*via 192.0.2.3, [20/0], 00:12:48, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222

But the issue here is with the way CEF load balancing is performed:

Load balancing is performed per flow and with flow is meant a source IP , destination IP pair

Because your destination prefix is actually a single host 192.0.2.254/32 you can try to change the source address.

IF you can do this, you should see used also the second path.

CEF load balancing uses  a binary EXOR of least significant bits in source IP and destination IP and a seed value chosen at router boot to choice the exit link for a specific flow.

 

Enabling per packet load balancing even if possibile is not recommended

 

Hope to help

Giuseppe

 

Testing was done with multiple source IP’s. In this diagram the router performing multipath is running NX-OS. I tried changing load-sharing options with no luck. Is NX-OS able to perform load sharing for bgp learned routes?

Hello @Daniel Graham ,

looking at load balancing documents for Nexus I have found the following feature

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/nx-os/itd/configuration/guide/b-Cisco-Nexus-7000-Series-Intelligent-Traffic-Director-Configuration-Guide/m-conf-itd-72.html

 

I don't know if this can apply to your network scenario but I think it is wise to give a look at it.

 

Hope to help

Giuseppe

 

I'm running Nexus 3k, doesn't look like its supported.

 

Also found this, no matter what source IP I use it has the same result:

 

 

192.0.2.1# show routing hash 10.0.0.2 192.0.2.254
Load-share parameters used for software forwarding:
load-share mode: address source-destination port source-destination
Universal-id seed: 0xed
No IPv4 protocol specified, defaulting to UDP
Hash for VRF "default"
Hashing to path *192.0.2.2
Out Interface: Vlan10
For route:
192.0.2.254/32, ubest/mbest: 2/0
    *via 192.0.2.2, [20/0], 00:00:57, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222
    *via 192.0.2.3, [20/0], 00:01:02, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222
192.0.2.1# show routing hash 192.168.0.2 192.0.2.254
Load-share parameters used for software forwarding:
load-share mode: address source-destination port source-destination
Universal-id seed: 0xed
No IPv4 protocol specified, defaulting to UDP
Hash for VRF "default"
Hashing to path *192.0.2.2
Out Interface: Vlan10
For route:
192.0.2.254/32, ubest/mbest: 2/0
    *via 192.0.2.2, [20/0], 00:00:57, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222
    *via 192.0.2.3, [20/0], 00:01:02, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222

 

Hello @Daniel Graham ,

for the way the hash is calculated the best way to see if load balancing is happening is to change the least significant byte of the source address

For example

source1:  10.0.0.2

source2:   192.168.0.3

 

the hash happens on the last meaningful bits of source and destination address so if you use the same value on the last 4th byte the same link is chosen regardless of what the first three bytes of the source address are.

 

Hope to help

Giuseppe

 

Good to know its based on least significant bit. Unfortunately no change -

 

 

192.0.2.1# show routing hash 10.0.0.2 192.0.2.254
Load-share parameters used for software forwarding:
load-share mode: address source-destination port source-destination
Universal-id seed: 0xed
No IPv4 protocol specified, defaulting to UDP
Hash for VRF "default"
Hashing to path *192.0.2.2
Out Interface: Vlan10
For route:
192.0.2.254/32, ubest/mbest: 2/0
    *via 192.0.2.2, [20/0], 00:00:48, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222
    *via 192.0.2.3, [20/0], 00:00:57, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222
192.0.2.1# show routing hash 192.168.0.3 192.0.2.254
Load-share parameters used for software forwarding:
load-share mode: address source-destination port source-destination
Universal-id seed: 0xed
No IPv4 protocol specified, defaulting to UDP
Hash for VRF "default"
Hashing to path *192.0.2.2
Out Interface: Vlan10
For route:
192.0.2.254/32, ubest/mbest: 2/0
    *via 192.0.2.2, [20/0], 00:01:01, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222
    *via 192.0.2.3, [20/0], 00:01:10, bgp-65111, external, tag 65222

I also tested with change to ip load-sharing mode and tested with different protocols and ports, all with no change. Here is the mode currently set.

 

192.0.2.1# show ip load-sharing
IPv4/IPv6 ECMP load sharing:
Universal-id (Random Seed): 237
Load-share mode : address source-destination

Hello @Daniel Graham ,

the last show tells what the device is actually doing

It makes an EXOR of the last byte of source with destination and then an EXOR with the random seed value 237.

 

192.0.2.1# show ip load-sharing
IPv4/IPv6 ECMP load sharing:
Universal-id (Random Seed): 237
Load-share mode : address source-destination

 

It is not so immediate to find two flows that take a different path.

 

Hope to help

Giuseppe

 

That makes sense, thanks for pointing these things out.

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card